Image from Google Jackets

Death and divine judgment in Ecclesiastes / Kumiko Takeuchi. [print]

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Bulletin for biblical research supplementsPublication details: University Park, Pennsylvania : Pennsylvania State University Press, [(c)2019.Description: xv, 238 pages ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9781575069913
  • 1575069911
Subject(s): Genre/Form: LOC classification:
  • BS1475.6.T354.D438 2019
  • BS1475.6.D34.T136.D438 2019
Available additional physical forms:
Contents:
Historical context How should we read Ecclesiastes? ; Issues of death and injustice in Qoheleth's monologue Qoheleth's dilemma and resolution Finding coherence between Qoheleth's monologue and the epilogue A possible role of Ecclesiastes in the emergence of Jewish apocalyptic eschatology.
Summary: In Death and Divine Judgment in Ecclesiastes, Kumiko Takeuchi provides a fresh take on the book of Ecclesiastes. Building on the current scholarly consensus that locates the composition of this book of the Hebrew Bible in the postexilic era, circa the late fourth or early third century BCE, Takeuchi proposes that Ecclesiastes may have served as a provocative voice for, or as a catalyst to, the emergence of apocalyptic eschatology and later sectarian conflicts within Judaism in the mid-Second Temple period. During the postexilic era, when retributive justice appeared to be absent or not assured, some Israelites began to question traditional views of death, Sheol, and divine judgment. Situating Ecclesiastes in this social and historical context, Takeuchi reveals the book's hidden arguments in favor of posthumous divine judgment as a means to rectifying premortem injustices. Takeuchi advocates a modified frame-narrative reading of Ecclesiastes, arguing that the role of the third-person narrative in Ecclesiastes is pivotal for understanding the paradoxes within Qoheleth's monologue, its relationship to the epilogue, and the book's overall purpose. The arguments in Death and Divine Judgment in Ecclesiastes challenge both traditional interpretations of the book of Ecclesiastes and conventional wisdom about when the belief in the postmortem application of divine justice began to take hold in Israelite society. This innovative interpretation is a must-read for biblical scholars, particularly those whose work focuses on the concept of justice. https://www.amazon.com/Judgment-Ecclesiastes-Bulletin-Biblical-Supplement/dp/1575069911/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=9781575069913&qid=1570475554&sr=8-1
Item type: Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status) List(s) this item appears in: Joel
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Notes Date due Barcode
Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status) G. Allen Fleece Library Circulating Collection - First Floor Non-fiction BS1475.6.T354.D438 2019 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 31923001767736
Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status) G. Allen Fleece Library Circulating Collection - First Floor Non-fiction BS1475.6.T354.D438 2019 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available Alumni Author 31923001690979

Alumni Author

Historical context How should we read Ecclesiastes? ; Issues of death and injustice in Qoheleth's monologue Qoheleth's dilemma and resolution Finding coherence between Qoheleth's monologue and the epilogue A possible role of Ecclesiastes in the emergence of Jewish apocalyptic eschatology.

In Death and Divine Judgment in Ecclesiastes, Kumiko Takeuchi provides a fresh take on the book of Ecclesiastes. Building on the current scholarly consensus that locates the composition of this book of the Hebrew Bible in the postexilic era, circa the late fourth or early third century BCE, Takeuchi proposes that Ecclesiastes may have served as a provocative voice for, or as a catalyst to, the emergence of apocalyptic eschatology and later sectarian conflicts within Judaism in the mid-Second Temple period. During the postexilic era, when retributive justice appeared to be absent or not assured, some Israelites began to question traditional views of death, Sheol, and divine judgment. Situating Ecclesiastes in this social and historical context, Takeuchi reveals the book's hidden arguments in favor of posthumous divine judgment as a means to rectifying premortem injustices. Takeuchi advocates a modified frame-narrative reading of Ecclesiastes, arguing that the role of the third-person narrative in Ecclesiastes is pivotal for understanding the paradoxes within Qoheleth's monologue, its relationship to the epilogue, and the book's overall purpose. The arguments in Death and Divine Judgment in Ecclesiastes challenge both traditional interpretations of the book of Ecclesiastes and conventional wisdom about when the belief in the postmortem application of divine justice began to take hold in Israelite society. This innovative interpretation is a must-read for biblical scholars, particularly those whose work focuses on the concept of justice.

https://www.amazon.com/Judgment-Ecclesiastes-Bulletin-Biblical-Supplement/dp/1575069911/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=9781575069913&qid=1570475554&sr=8-1

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

https://lib.ciu.edu/copyright-request-form

Kumiko Takeuchi is a fellow with Global Scholars in Olathe, Kansas.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha