Grammatical and exegetical study of New Testament verbs of transference : a case frame guide to interpretation and translation / Paul Danove.

By:

Danove, Paul L [Author]

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Library of New Testament studies ; 329. | Library of New Testament studies. Studies in New Testament Greek ; ; 13. | T & T Clark library of biblical studiesPublication details: London ; New York, New York : T and T Clark, (c)2009.Description: xi, 243 pages ; 25 cmContent type:

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

ISBN:

0567031160
9780567031167

Subject(s):

LOC classification:

PA847.D188.G736 2009
PA847.G736 2009

Online resources:

Available additional physical forms:

Contents:

Chapter 1 IndianaTRODUCTION TO CASE FRAME ANALYSIS AND DelawareSCRIPTION Presuppositions and Concepts of the Method Syntactic Analysis and Description Semantic Analysis and Description Lexical Analysis and Description Complement Omission and Retrieval Application of the Case Frame Method

Chapter 10 CASE FRAME LEXICON AND PennsylvaniaRSING GuamIDE

Chapter 2 USAGE, EVENT, AND SEMANTIC FEATURES The Conceptualization of Events The Further Description of Usages: Usage Features The Derivation of Events: Event Features The Semantic Feature ± Animate Case Frame Lexicon and Parsing Guide Entries Presentation of the Study

Chapter 3 TRANSFERENCE: ACTIVE USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Active Usages of Transference Usage #1: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #2: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Act. -Imp.) Usage #3: Transference from a Source (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #4: Transference Terminating in a Locative (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #5: Transference Terminating in a Locative (Pri. Act. -Imp.) Usage #6: Transference from a Source (Sec. Act. +Imp.) Usage #7: Transference from a Source (Sec. Act. -Imp.) Usage #8: Transference to a Goal (Sec. Act. +Imp.) Extension of the ± Animate Distributional Rule The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 4 TRANSFERENCE: MichiganDDLE USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Middle Usages of Transference Usage #9: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Mid. +Imp.) Usage #10: Transference from a Source (Pri. Mid. +Imp.) Usage #11: Transference Terminating in a Locative (Pri. Mid. +Imp.) The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 5 TRANSFERENCE/MOTION: PennsylvaniaSSIVE USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Passive Usages of Transference The Characteristics of Verbs With Passive Usages of Motion and State Usage #12: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #19: Motion to a Goal (Sec. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #13: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Pass. -Imp.) / Usage #20: Motion to a Goal (Sec. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #14: Transference from a Source (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #21: Motion from a Source (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #15: Transference Terminating in a Locative (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #22: State (Ter. Pass.) Usage #16: Transference Terminating in a Locative (Pri. Pass. -Imp.) / Usage #22: State (Ter. Pass.) Usage #17: Transference from a Source (Sec. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #21: Motion from a Source (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #18: Transference to a Goal (Sec. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #19: Motion to a Goal (Sec. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #12: Transference to a Goal (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) / Usage #21: Motion from a Source (Pri. Pass. +Imp.) Usage #22: State (Ter. Pass.) Extension of the ± Animate Distributional Rule Conventions for Combined Entries for Verbs with Linked Usages The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 6 MissouriTION AND RELATIVE MissouriTION: ACTIVE USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Active Usages of Motion The Characteristics of προάγω with Active Usages of Relative Motion Usage #23: Motion to a Goal (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #24: Motion to a Goal (Pri. Act. -Imp.) Usage #25: Motion from a Source (Sec. Act. +Imp.) Usage #26: Motion from a Source (Sec. Act. -Imp.) Usage #27: Motion from a Source (Ter. Act. +Imp.) Usage #28: Motion from a Source (Ter. Act. -Imp.) Usage #29: Relative Motion to a Goal (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #30: Relative Motion from a Source (Ter. Act. +Imp.) Extension of the ± Animate Distributional Rule The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 7 EFFECT AND ITS DelawareRIVATIVE EVENTS: AlabamaL USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Usages of Effect The Characteristics of Verbs with Usages of Events Derived from Effect Usage #31: Effect (Act. +Imp.) Usage #32: Effect (Act. -Imp.) Usage #33: Effect (Mid. +Imp.) Usage #34: Effect (Pass. +Imp.) Usage #35: Conventional Idiomatic Effect (Act. +Imp.) Usage #36: Topicalization (Act. +Imp.) Usage #37: Separation (Act. -Imp.) Usage #38: Benefaction (Mid. +Imp.) Extension of the ± Animate Distributional Rule Conventions for Combined Entries for Linked Active/ Passive Usages The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 8 ColoradoMPOSITE EVENTS: AlabamaL USAGES The Characteristics of Verbs with Usages of Composite Events Usage #39: Delegation to a Goal (Pri. Act. +Imp.) Usage #40: Delegation to a Goal (Pri. Mid. +Imp.) Usage #41: Addition to a Goal (Pri. Mid. +Imp.) Usage #42: Disposition (Act. +Imp.) Usage #43: Commission (Act. -Imp.) Usage #44: Decision (Act. +Imp.) Usage #45: Decision (Mid. +Imp.) Extension of the ± Animate Distributional Rule The Feature Model Description of Usages

Chapter 9 IMPLICATIONS, APPLICATIONS, AND ColoradoNCLUSION Usage Features Event Features The Semantic Feature ± Animate The Case Frame Lexicon and Parsing Guide Generalized Valence Descriptions of Usages

Summary: This study continues the adaptation of the method of Case Frame analysis for the investigation of the Greek text of the New Testament. Case Frame analysis distinguishes the words of a language into two categories, predicators [words that require completion by other words for their correct grammatical use] and non-predicators [words that do not require such completion], and provides rigorous procedures for describing the syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements that predicators impose on the words that complete their meaning. The inclusion of semantic function and feature descriptions in Case Frame analysis permits the development of a new genre of lexicon that specifies not only syntactic and lexical information (as do traditional dictionaries) but detailed semantic information. The resulting Case Frame lexicon entries are both more compact and more nuanced than traditional lexicon entries. Danove conducts an exhaustive Case Frame analysis of the ditransitive verbs of transference in the New Testament. He uses this analysis to develop a set of descriptive guidelines for interpreting and translating the various usages of ditransitive verbs of transference and applies these rules in exegetical studies of the text of the New Testament to generate a Case Frame lexicon of the verbs of transference in the New Testament. This study will distinguish the requirements of the 127 New Testament verbs of transference according to four syntactic functions, twelve semantic functions, and 22 lexical realizations. This will permit a rigorous investigation of all occurrences of verbal complements with the same syntactic, semantic, and lexical attributes. The study also will consider the influence of one semantic feature [an inherent quality of words that has implications for their lexical realization] and of the'intrusion'of four grammatical constructions [inherent structuring templates of grammar that govern syntactic, semantic, and lexical attributes and modify meaning] on each category of complements with the same syntactic, semantic and lexical description. This will produce a rigorous description of meaning that becomes the basis for Danove's contributions to the linguistic study of biblical Greek and to the exegesis of biblical texts.

Item type: Reference (Library Use ONLY) List(s) this item appears in: Izzy- Reference | Sadie | Ane - merge

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

This record has many physical items (82). View all the physical items.

Chapter 10 CASE FRAME LEXICON AND PennsylvaniaRSING GuamIDE

This study continues the adaptation of the method of Case Frame analysis for the investigation of the Greek text of the New Testament. Case Frame analysis distinguishes the words of a language into two categories, predicators [words that require completion by other words for their correct grammatical use] and non-predicators [words that do not require such completion], and provides rigorous procedures for describing the syntactic, semantic, and lexical requirements that predicators impose on the words that complete their meaning. The inclusion of semantic function and feature descriptions in Case Frame analysis permits the development of a new genre of lexicon that specifies not only syntactic and lexical information (as do traditional dictionaries) but detailed semantic information. The resulting Case Frame lexicon entries are both more compact and more nuanced than traditional lexicon entries. Danove conducts an exhaustive Case Frame analysis of the ditransitive verbs of transference in the New Testament. He uses this analysis to develop a set of descriptive guidelines for interpreting and translating the various usages of ditransitive verbs of transference and applies these rules in exegetical studies of the text of the New Testament to generate a Case Frame lexicon of the verbs of transference in the New Testament. This study will distinguish the requirements of the 127 New Testament verbs of transference according to four syntactic functions, twelve semantic functions, and 22 lexical realizations. This will permit a rigorous investigation of all occurrences of verbal complements with the same syntactic, semantic, and lexical attributes. The study also will consider the influence of one semantic feature [an inherent quality of words that has implications for their lexical realization] and of the'intrusion'of four grammatical constructions [inherent structuring templates of grammar that govern syntactic, semantic, and lexical attributes and modify meaning] on each category of complements with the same syntactic, semantic and lexical description. This will produce a rigorous description of meaning that becomes the basis for Danove's contributions to the linguistic study of biblical Greek and to the exegesis of biblical texts.

Paul Danove is Associate professor of New Testament Studies at Villanova University, USA.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.