Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults : judging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives / Audun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel ; with commentary by Melanie Killen and Kelly Lynn Mulvey ; Patricia J. Bauer, series editor. [print]

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

text

Media type:

unmediated

Carrier type:

volume

Subject(s):

LOC classification:

BF723.M54 M673 2018
BF723.M54.M961.M673 2018

Online resources:

Online version

Available additional physical forms:

Contents:

Introduction/ Audun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel ; Investigating both evaluations and reasoning about systematically varied trolley car situations/ Audun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, and Elliot Turiel ; Varying the involvement of the potential victims/ Audun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel ; General discussion/ Audun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel ; Commentary: Challenging a dual-process approach to moral reasoning : adolescents and adults evaluations of trolley car situations/ Melanie Killen and Kelly Lynn Mulvey.

Summary: The value of human life is a significant moral value for most people. Yet, past research has devoted little attention to the development of moral reasoning about the value of life. The present studies investigated how adolescents and adults reason about the value of life in the context of so-called trolley car situations. These situations, adopted from philosophy, involve the option of sacrificing the life of one person to save five others. Based on past developmental research, we expected that individuals would reason about distinct and sometimes conflicting considerations regarding the value of life. This approach contrasted with past research on adults' responses to trolley car situations, which has been taken to show that most moral evaluations are based not on reasoning but on affective, automatic reactions. In Study 1, 288 adolescents and adults were interviewed about trolley car situations designed to examine considerations like the value of human life and the relationship of those at risk with the actors. In Study 2, 144 college students were interviewed to further examine the roles of those involved. Participants' justifications referred not only to the number of lives saved, but also to other considerations, such as intrinsic rights and personal responsibility for events. Moreover, responses indicated frequent conflicts about standard trolley car situations, counter to the argument that people's evaluations are automatic or based solely on a counting of lives saved. The present findings indicate that adolescents and adults reason about, and seek to coordinate, distinct moral considerations regarding the value of life.

Item type: Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status)

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status)	G. Allen Fleece Library Circulating Collection - First Floor	BF723.M54 M673 2018 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		31923001794672

The value of human life is a significant moral value for most people. Yet, past research has devoted little attention to the development of moral reasoning about the value of life. The present studies investigated how adolescents and adults reason about the value of life in the context of so-called trolley car situations. These situations, adopted from philosophy, involve the option of sacrificing the life of one person to save five others. Based on past developmental research, we expected that individuals would reason about distinct and sometimes conflicting considerations regarding the value of life. This approach contrasted with past research on adults' responses to trolley car situations, which has been taken to show that most moral evaluations are based not on reasoning but on affective, automatic reactions. In Study 1, 288 adolescents and adults were interviewed about trolley car situations designed to examine considerations like the value of human life and the relationship of those at risk with the actors. In Study 2, 144 college students were interviewed to further examine the roles of those involved. Participants' justifications referred not only to the number of lives saved, but also to other considerations, such as intrinsic rights and personal responsibility for events. Moreover, responses indicated frequent conflicts about standard trolley car situations, counter to the argument that people's evaluations are automatic or based solely on a counting of lives saved. The present findings indicate that adolescents and adults reason about, and seek to coordinate, distinct moral considerations regarding the value of life. Link to source of summary

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Back to results

1 Moral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults :
2 What heals and why? :
by Lockhart, Kristi L.,
3 A Longitudinal study of infant cortisol response during learning events /
by Thompson, Laura A.,
4 The development of mental processing :
5 Review of child development research.
6 Review of child development research.
7 Review of child development research.
8 Child development /
9 Child development perspectives /
10 Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
11 Child development perspectives
12 Child development