Image from Google Jackets

Civil liberties : opposing viewpoints / Tamara L. Roleff, book editor. [print]

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Opposing viewpoints seriesPublication details: San Diego, California : Greenhaven Press, (c)1999.Description: 208 pages : illustrations ; 23 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 1565109376
  • 1565109368
Subject(s): LOC classification:
  • KF4749.C585 1999
Online resources:
Available additional physical forms:
  • COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:
Contents:
Chapter 1. Should limits be placed on freedom of expression? Free speech should be restricted Mark Y. Herring Free speech should not be restricted Mark Turiano Hate speech should be restricted Richard Delgado and David Yun Hate speech should not be restricted American Civil Liberties Union Flag burning as political speech should be restricted Richard Parker Flag burning as political speech should not be restricted Part I: Roger Pilon, Part II: Carole Shields The government should legislate against pornography Catherine Itzin Pornography should not be restricted Nadine Strossen -- Chapter 2. Is the right to privacy threatened? A loss of privacy benefits society Amitai Etzioni A loss of privacy harms society Joseph S. Fulda More laws are needed to protect privacy Cass R. Sunstein More laws are not needed to protect privacy Jane E. Kirtley Random drug tests on student-athletes do not violate the right to privacy Antonin Scalia ... [and others] Random drug tests on student-athletes violate the right to privacy Sandra Day O'Connor, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter Wiretaps violate the right to privacy Laura W. Murphy Wiretaps are necessary to fight crime David Gelernter -- Chapter 3. Should church and state be separate? The Constitution's framers intended strict separation of church and state Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs The Constitution's framers did not intend strict separation of church and state M. Stanton Evans School prayer threatens religious liberty Roger Simon Prohibiting school prayer threatens religious liberty Linda Bowles Tax dollars should not fund religious schools Bob Peterson Tax dollars should fund religious schools Denis P. Doyle -- Chapter 4. How does the internet affect civil liberties? The Internet threatens the right to privacy Nathaniel Sheppard Jr. The Internet's invasion of privacy is exaggerated Joseph Burns Indecent material on the Internet should be censored Shyla Welch Censoring indecent material on the Internet violates free speech American Civil Liberties Union Computer encryption threatens public safety Robert S. Litt Computer encryption codes are necessary to protect privacy Part I: Peter Wayner, Part II: James P. Lucier.
Item type: Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Circulating Book (checkout times vary with patron status) G. Allen Fleece Library Circulating Collection - First Floor Non-fiction KF4749.A2.C497 1999 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 31923001010509

Chapter 1. Should limits be placed on freedom of expression? Free speech should be restricted Mark Y. Herring Free speech should not be restricted Mark Turiano Hate speech should be restricted Richard Delgado and David Yun Hate speech should not be restricted American Civil Liberties Union Flag burning as political speech should be restricted Richard Parker Flag burning as political speech should not be restricted Part I: Roger Pilon, Part II: Carole Shields The government should legislate against pornography Catherine Itzin Pornography should not be restricted Nadine Strossen -- Chapter 2. Is the right to privacy threatened? A loss of privacy benefits society Amitai Etzioni A loss of privacy harms society Joseph S. Fulda More laws are needed to protect privacy Cass R. Sunstein More laws are not needed to protect privacy Jane E. Kirtley Random drug tests on student-athletes do not violate the right to privacy Antonin Scalia ... [and others] Random drug tests on student-athletes violate the right to privacy Sandra Day O'Connor, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter Wiretaps violate the right to privacy Laura W. Murphy Wiretaps are necessary to fight crime David Gelernter -- Chapter 3. Should church and state be separate? The Constitution's framers intended strict separation of church and state Baptist Joint Committee on Public Affairs The Constitution's framers did not intend strict separation of church and state M. Stanton Evans School prayer threatens religious liberty Roger Simon Prohibiting school prayer threatens religious liberty Linda Bowles Tax dollars should not fund religious schools Bob Peterson Tax dollars should fund religious schools Denis P. Doyle -- Chapter 4. How does the internet affect civil liberties? The Internet threatens the right to privacy Nathaniel Sheppard Jr. The Internet's invasion of privacy is exaggerated Joseph Burns Indecent material on the Internet should be censored Shyla Welch Censoring indecent material on the Internet violates free speech American Civil Liberties Union Computer encryption threatens public safety Robert S. Litt Computer encryption codes are necessary to protect privacy Part I: Peter Wayner, Part II: James P. Lucier.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission:

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha