Technology and society : opposing viewpoints / Auriana Ojeda, book editor. [print]

Technology has harmed society Tom Mahon -- Technology has improved society V.V. Raman -- Technology has created a digital divide Mickey Revenaugh -- Technology has not created a digital divide Eric Cohen -- The government should regulate technology William J. Ray -- The government should not regulate technology James K. Glassman -- Research involving human subjects is vital to medicine Jennifer Brookes -- Research involving human subjects is prone to abuse Neal D. Barnard -- Selling human organs is ethical The lancet -- Selling human organs is unethical William E. Stempsey -- Animal transplants may solve the organ shortage Steve Connor -- Animal transplants will not solve the organ shortage Alan H. Berger and Gil Lamont -- Fetal stem cell research may improve medicine Lawrence S.B. Goldstein -- Fetal stem cell research is unethical John Kass -- The internet threatens privacy Jeffrey Rothfeder -- Technology may not threaten privacy Travis Charbeneau -- Workplace monitoring violates employee privacy Dana Hawkins -- Workplace monitoring can be ethical Laura Pincus Hartman -- The future of technology can be predicted Ian D. Pearson -- The future of technology cannot be predicted Roger A. Pielke Jr. and Dan Sarewitz -- Technology may threaten society Will Knight -- Technology will not threaten society Chris Malcolm -- Technology may affect human nature Joseph D'Agnese -- Technology will not affect human nature Steven Pinker -- Society must be restructured to accommodate technology William H. Davidow.

COPYRIGHT NOT covered - Click this link to request copyright permission: