Technology and society : opposing viewpoints /
Technology and society : opposing viewpoints / [print]
Auriana Ojeda, book editor.
- San Diego, California : Greenhaven Press ; (c)2002. Detroit : Gale Group Thomson Learning, (c)2002.
- 219 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm.
- Opposing viewpoints series .
- Opposing viewpoints series (Unnumbered) .
Technology has harmed society Technology has improved society Technology has created a digital divide Technology has not created a digital divide The government should regulate technology The government should not regulate technology Research involving human subjects is vital to medicine Research involving human subjects is prone to abuse Selling human organs is ethical Selling human organs is unethical Animal transplants may solve the organ shortage Animal transplants will not solve the organ shortage Fetal stem cell research may improve medicine Fetal stem cell research is unethical The internet threatens privacy Technology may not threaten privacy Workplace monitoring violates employee privacy Workplace monitoring can be ethical The future of technology can be predicted The future of technology cannot be predicted Technology may threaten society Technology will not threaten society Technology may affect human nature Technology will not affect human nature Society must be restructured to accommodate technology Tom Mahon -- V.V. Raman -- Mickey Revenaugh -- Eric Cohen -- William J. Ray -- James K. Glassman -- Jennifer Brookes -- Neal D. Barnard -- The lancet -- William E. Stempsey -- Steve Connor -- Alan H. Berger and Gil Lamont -- Lawrence S.B. Goldstein -- John Kass -- Jeffrey Rothfeder -- Travis Charbeneau -- Dana Hawkins -- Laura Pincus Hartman -- Ian D. Pearson -- Roger A. Pielke Jr. and Dan Sarewitz -- Will Knight -- Chris Malcolm -- Joseph D'Agnese -- Steven Pinker -- William H. Davidow.
9780737709124 9780737709131
2001050185
Technology--Social aspects.
Technological innovations--Social aspects.
HM846.O39.T434 2002 HM846
Technology has harmed society Technology has improved society Technology has created a digital divide Technology has not created a digital divide The government should regulate technology The government should not regulate technology Research involving human subjects is vital to medicine Research involving human subjects is prone to abuse Selling human organs is ethical Selling human organs is unethical Animal transplants may solve the organ shortage Animal transplants will not solve the organ shortage Fetal stem cell research may improve medicine Fetal stem cell research is unethical The internet threatens privacy Technology may not threaten privacy Workplace monitoring violates employee privacy Workplace monitoring can be ethical The future of technology can be predicted The future of technology cannot be predicted Technology may threaten society Technology will not threaten society Technology may affect human nature Technology will not affect human nature Society must be restructured to accommodate technology Tom Mahon -- V.V. Raman -- Mickey Revenaugh -- Eric Cohen -- William J. Ray -- James K. Glassman -- Jennifer Brookes -- Neal D. Barnard -- The lancet -- William E. Stempsey -- Steve Connor -- Alan H. Berger and Gil Lamont -- Lawrence S.B. Goldstein -- John Kass -- Jeffrey Rothfeder -- Travis Charbeneau -- Dana Hawkins -- Laura Pincus Hartman -- Ian D. Pearson -- Roger A. Pielke Jr. and Dan Sarewitz -- Will Knight -- Chris Malcolm -- Joseph D'Agnese -- Steven Pinker -- William H. Davidow.
9780737709124 9780737709131
2001050185
Technology--Social aspects.
Technological innovations--Social aspects.
HM846.O39.T434 2002 HM846