000			05719nam a2200445Ki 4500
001			ocn864552001
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105427.0
008			131203s2013 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT
020			_a9780191668821 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)l((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)ctronic bk.
050	0	4	_aK123 _b.P764 2013
049			_aNTA
100	1		_aSarvarian, Arman, _e1
245	1	0	_aProfessional ethics at the international bar /Arman Sarvarian.
250			_aFirst edition.
260			_aOxford : _bOxford university press, _c(c)2013.
260			_aOxford _bOxford University Press, _c(c)2013.
300			_a1 online resource (xxvi, 306 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aInternational courts and tribunals series
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aMachine generated contents note: 1.The Role of Counsel Ethics in International Litigation -- _t1.1.The Function of the International Judicial System -- _t1.2.The Role of Professional Advocacy in International Litigation -- _t1.2.1.Professionalism -- _t1.2.2.Professionalization -- _t1.2.3.Fundamental Ethical Duties -- _t1.3.Arguments for the Professionalization of Advocacy -- _t1.3.1.Solving Practical Problems -- _t1.3.2.Enhancing the Image of International Courts -- _t1.3.3.Stages of Professionalization -- _t1.4.Arguments against the Professionalization of Advocacy -- _t1.4.1.Common Ethical Standards are Impossible -- _t1.4.2.Enforcement is Impracticable -- _t1.4.3.Professionalization would Infringe Sovereignty -- _t1.5.Conclusions -- _t2.The Historical Development of National Ethical Traditions -- _t2.1.European Traditions -- _t2.1.1.Historical Background -- _t2.1.2.France -- _t2.1.3.England and Wales -- _t2.2.The American Tradition -- _t2.2.1.Historical Development -- _t2.2.2.Ethical Standards --
505	0	0	_aContents note continued: 2.2.3.Ethical Efficacy -- _t2.3.Asian Traditions -- _t2.3.1.China -- _t2.3.2.Japan -- _t2.4.Islamic Traditions of the Near East -- _t2.4.1.Saudi Arabia -- _t2.4.2.Iran -- _t2.5.Conclusions -- _t3.The Historical Development of International Advocacy -- _t3.1.Ancient: and Classical Arbitration -- _t3.1.1.Antiquity -- _t3.1.2.Middle Ages -- _t3.1.3.Early Modern Age -- _t3.2.The Permanent Court of Arbitration -- _t3.3.The Permanent Court of International Justice -- _t3.3.1.The Creation of the PCIJ -- _t3.3.2.Statute -- _t3.3.3.Rules of Procedure -- _t3.3.4.Calls for an International Bar -- _t3.4.Conclusions -- _t4.The International Court of Justice -- _t4.1.Historical Background -- _t4.2.Admission Requirements -- _t4.2.1.Agents -- _t4.2.2.Membership of a National Bar -- _t4.2.3.Academic Lawyers -- _t4.2.4.Experts -- _t4.2.5.Legal Aid -- _t4.3.Ethical Standards -- _t4.3.1.Duties to the Client -- _t4.3.2.Duties to the Court -- _t4.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- _t4.5.Conclusions -- _t5.The European Court of Justice --
505	0	0	_aContents note continued: 5.1.Historical Background -- _t5.2.Admission Requirements -- _t5.2.1.Agents -- _t5.2.2.Lawyers -- _t5.2.3.Employed Lawyers -- _t5.2.4.Experts -- _t5.3.Ethical Standards -- _t5.3.1.Duties to the Client -- _t5.3.2.Duties to the Court -- _t5.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- _t5.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- _t5.5.Conclusions -- _t6.The European Court of Human Rights -- _t6.1.Historical Background -- _t6.2.Admission Requirements -- _t6.3.Ethical Standards -- _t6.3.1.Duties to the Client -- _t6.3.2.Duties to the Court -- _t6.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- _t6.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- _t6.5.Conclusions -- _t7.Investment Arbitration -- _t7.1.Historical Background -- _t7.2.Admission Requirements -- _t7.3.Ethical Standards -- _t7.3.1.Duties to the Client -- _t7.3.2.Duties to the Tribunal -- _t7.3.3.Duties to Colleagues -- _t7.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- _t7.5.Conclusions -- _t8.The International Criminal Court -- _t8.1.Historical Background -- _t8.1.1.Nuremberg -- _t8.1.2.ICTY -- _t8.2.Admission Requirements --
505	0	0	_aContents note continued: 8.2.1.Prosecutors -- _t8.2.2.Defence Counsel -- _t8.3.Ethical Standards -- _t8.3.1.Prosecutors -- _t8.3.2.Defence Counsel -- _t8.4.Disciplinary Jurisdiction -- _t8.4.1.Prosecutors -- _t8.4.2.Defence Counsel -- _t8.4.3.Double Deontology -- _t8.5.Conclusions -- _t9.Developing Common Ethical Standards before International Courts -- _t9.1.Regulatory Jurisdiction of International Courts -- _t9.1.1.Powers to Regulate Counsel -- _t9.1.2.Practical Ability to Regulate Counsel -- _t9.2.Articulation of Common Ethical Standards -- _t9.2.1.ILA Hague Principles -- _t9.2.2.IBA Guidelines -- _t9.2.3.CCBE -- _t9.3.Conclusions -- _t10.Towards an International Bar -- _t10.1.Centralization of Regulatory Authority -- _t10.2.National Enforcement of Ethical Standards -- _t10.3.International Bar Authority -- _t10.3.1.Bar Admission -- _t10.3.2.Code of Conduct -- _t10.3.3.Standing Disciplinary Panel -- _t10.4.Consequences of Professionalization -- _t10.4.1.Procedural Integrity -- _t10.4.2.Counsel Independence --
505	0	0	_aContents note continued: 10.4.3.Party Control over Case Presentation -- _t10.4.4.Exclusion of Non-Professionals -- _t10.4.5.Formation of a Collective Bar -- _t10.5.Conclusions.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aLegal ethics.
650		0	_aInternational courts.
650		0	_aProcedure (Law)
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=643213&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hK _m2013 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a02 _bNT
999			_c99962 _d99962
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell