000			03101cam a2200493Mi 4500
001			ocn830022784
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105409.0
008			120203s2013 nju obd 001 0 eng d
040			_aLGG _beng _epn _erda _cLGG _dOCLCO _dP@U _dOCLCQ _dIDEBK _dCDX _dYDXCP _dNT _dJSTOR _dE7B _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dNLGGC _dEBLCP _dDEBSZ _dCOO _dOCLCQ _dLOA _dAZK _dCASUM _dOCLCO _dCOCUF _dAGLDB _dOCLCQ _dMOR _dPIFAG _dMERUC _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dYDX _dOCLCQ _dZCU _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dU3W _dOCLCA _dEZ9 _dBUF _dOCLCO _dSTF _dWRM _dVTS _dNRAMU _dICG _dREC _dVT2 _dAU@ _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dWYU _dLVT _dTKN _dDKC _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dM8D _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dMM9 _dOCLCO
020			_a9780813554280 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
043			_an-us---
050	0	4	_aK4366 _b.I584 2013
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aHorowitz, Ruth, _d1947- _e1
245	1	0	_aIn the public interest : _bmedical licensing and the disciplinary process / _cRuth Horowitz.
260			_aNew Brunswick, N.J. : _bRutgers University Press, _c(c)2013.
300			_a1 online resource (1 volume)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aCritical issues in health and medicine
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aPublic member, researcher, and public sociologist -- _tHow licensure became a medical institution -- _tThe Federal bureaucracy starts a public dialogue -- _tThe state, the media, and the shaping of public opinion -- _tRhetorics of law, medicine, and public interest shape board work -- _tMedical and legal discourses in investigatory committees -- _tHearing and sanction deliberations : transparency and fact construction issues -- _tDemocratic deliberation and public interest.
520	0		_aIn the Public Interest investigates the mechanisms that democratic societies have used to certify that those working as licensed doctors are properly trained and supervised as they deliver critical services to the public. It analyzes the workings of the crucial public institutions charged with maintaining the safety and legitimacy of the U.S. medical profession and provides prescriptive measures, addresses problems in need of reform, and suggests new procedures, resource allocation, and educat.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPhysicians _xLicenses _zUnited States.
650		0	_aClinical competence _zUnited States.
650		0	_aMedical policy _zUnited States.
650		0	_aPhysicians _xLicenses.
650		0	_aClinical competence.
650	1	2	_aLicensure, Medical
650	2	2	_aClinical Competence
650	2	2	_aGovernment Regulation
650	2	2	_aProfessional Autonomy
650	2	2	_aProfessional Review Organizations
650	2	2	_aPublic Opinion
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=592672&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hK _m(c)2013 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c99022 _d99022
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell