000			03611cam a2200457 i 4500
001			ocn826291109
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105333.0
008			120705s2013 miu ob s001 0 eng
010			_a2020707450
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dNT _dCDX _dYDXCP _dIDEBK _dE7B _dOCLCF _dIAT _dDEBSZ _dSNK _dSFB _dP@U _dBAL _dJSTOR _dAZK _dCOO _dCOCUF _dMOR _dPIFAG _dIOG _dU3W _dEZ9 _dSTF _dWRM _dNRAMU _dRRP _dCUS _dVT2 _dWYU _dLVT _dUKCRE _dUNOMP _dBOL _dAUD _dUAB
020			_a9780472028733 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
043			_an-us---
050	0	0	_aHQ1236 _b.P373 2013
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aGoss, Kristin A., _d1965- _e1
245	1	0	_aThe paradox of gender equality : _bhow American women's groups gained and lost their public voice / _cKristin A. Goss.
260			_aAnn Arbor : _bThe University of Michigan Press, _c(c)2013.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
340			_2rdacc _0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAColourContent/1003
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aCAWP series in gender and American politics
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aWomen's citizenship and American democracy -- _tSuffrage and the rise of women's policy advocacy -- _tThe second wave surges "and then" -- _tFrom public interest to "special interests" -- _tSameness, difference, and women's civic place -- _tWhat drove the changes? the not-so-easy answers -- _tHow public policy shaped women's civic place -- _tWomen, citizenship, and public policy in the 21st century.
520	0		_a"Drawing on original research, Kristin A. Goss examines how women's civic place has changed over the span of more than 120 years, how public policy has driven these changes, and why these changes matter for women and American democracy. Suffrage, which granted women the right to vote and invited their democratic participation, provided a dual platform for the expansion of women's policy agendas. As measured by women's groups' appearances before the U.S. Congress, women's collective political engagement continued to grow between 1920 and 1960 - when many conventional accounts claim it declined - and declined after 1980, when it might have been expected to grow. This waxing and waning was accompanied by major shifts in issue agendas, from broad public interests to narrow feminist interests. Goss suggests that ascriptive differences are not necessarily barriers to disadvantaged groups' capacity to be heard; that enhanced political inclusion does not necessarily lead to greater collective engagement; and that rights movements do not necessarily constitute the best way to understand the political participation of marginalized groups. She asks what women have gained - and perhaps lost - through expanded incorporation as well as whether single-sex organizations continue to matter in 21st-century America"--Jacket.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aWomen _xPolitical activity _zUnited States.
650		0	_aWomen's rights _zUnited States.
650		0	_aWomen _xSuffrage _zUnited States.
650		0	_aPolitical participation _zUnited States.
650		0	_aDemocracy _zUnited States.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520816&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hHQ.. _m2013 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c97017 _d97017
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell