000 | 03950cam a2200385Ki 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn828869697 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105332.0 | ||
008 | 130304s2013 mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aNT _beng _epn _erda _cNT _dYDXCP _dEMU _dE7B _dJSTOR _dCOO _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dNLGGC _dOCL _dOCLCO _dEBLCP _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dDEBSZ _dOCLCO _dUIU _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dAZK _dOCLCO _dLOA _dAGLDB _dPIFPO _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dZCU _dIOG _dOCLCO _dDEGRU _dDEBBG |
||
020 |
_a9780674075269 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
043 |
_aff----- _aaw----- _ae-uk--- |
||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aJC83 _b.A336 2013 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMcDaniel, Iain, _d1975- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAdam Ferguson in the Scottish enlightenment : _bthe Roman past and Europe's future / _cIain McDaniel. |
260 |
_aCambridge, Mass. : _bHarvard University Press, _c(c)2013. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aMontesquieu and the unfree republic -- _tMilitary government and empire in the Scottish enlightenment -- _tFerguson and the moral foundations of civil society -- _tTrajectories of the modern commercial state -- _tBritain's future in a Roman mirror -- _tCivil-military union and the modern state -- _tRevolution and modern republicanism. |
520 | 0 | _aAlthough overshadowed by his contemporaries Adam Smith and David Hume, the Scottish philosopher Adam Ferguson strongly influenced eighteenth-century currents of political thought. A major reassessment of this neglected figure, Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe's Future sheds new light on Ferguson as a serious critic, rather than an advocate, of the Enlightenment belief in liberal progress. Unlike the philosophes who looked upon Europe's growing prosperity and saw confirmation of a utopian future, Ferguson saw something else: a reminder of Rome's lesson that egalitarian democracy could become a self-undermining path to dictatorship. Ferguson viewed the intrinsic power struggle between civil and military authorities as the central dilemma of modern constitutional governments. He believed that the key to understanding the forces that propel nations toward tyranny lay in analysis of ancient Roman history. It was the alliance between popular and militaristic factions within the Roman republic, Ferguson believed, which ultimately precipitated its downfall. Democratic forces, intended as a means of liberation from tyranny, could all too easily become the engine of political oppression--a fear that proved prescient when the French Revolution spawned the expansionist wars of Napoleon. As Iain McDaniel makes clear, Ferguson's skepticism about the ability of constitutional states to weather pervasive conditions of warfare and emergency has particular relevance for twenty-first-century geopolitics. This revelatory study will resonate with debates over the troubling tendency of powerful democracies to curtail civil liberties and pursue imperial ambitions. | |
520 | 0 | _aUnlike his contemporaries, who saw Europe's prosperity as confirmation of a utopian future, the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher Adam Ferguson saw a reminder of Rome's lesson that egalitarian democracy could become a self-undermining path to dictatorship. This is a major reassessment of a critic overshadowed today by David Hume and Adam Smith. | |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 |
_aRepublicanism _zRome _xHistory. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aEnlightenment _zScotland. |
|
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=520746&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hJC _m2013 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c96961 _d96961 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |