000			03172nam a2200385Ki 4500
001			ocn829704723
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105321.0
008			130311s2013 nyua ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _cNT
020			_a9781139625302 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)l((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)ctronic bk.
043			_acl-----
050	0	4	_aHC125 _b.G563 2013
049			_aNTA
100	1		_aKaplan, Stephen B., _d1973- _e1
245	1	0	_aGlobalization and austerity politics in Latin AmericaStephen B. Kaplan.
260			_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c(c)2013.
300			_a1 online resource (xxi, 331 pages) : _billustrations.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aCambridge studies in comparative politics
504			_a2
505	0	0	_a1. Introduction -- _t2. Globalization and austerity politics -- _t3. The political economy of elections -- _t4. The electoral boom-bust cycle -- _t5. From gunboat to trading-floor diplomacy -- _t6. When Latin American grasshoppers become ants -- _t7. The political austerity cycle -- _t8 Conclusion -- _tAppendix A. Field research interviews.
520	0		_a"The book explores the effect of financial globalization on Latin American economic policy making"-- _cProvided by publisher.
520	0		_a"Developing country politicians in a financially globalized world su.er a similar fate. Hoping to lift their countries to development's pinnacle, they toil against the .erce force of globalization. The repeatedly roll the policy boulder up the mountain. Hoping to please mercurial markets, governments cut spending, hike interest rates, and balance budgets. With each economic crisis, however, the rock repeatedly tumbles down the mountain. In this manner, .nancial volatility has wreaked havoc on developing country economies over the last two decades. Why are some countries able to surmount the gravity of globalization, while others su.er from a Sisyphus-like misfortune? Let us begin by taking a brief South American sojourn to Argentina and Venezuela. With the rise of the Latin American left over the last decade, scholars and the popular press have often placed these two countries under a similar radical or populist banner. 1 They share other political and economic characteristics too. They are both presidential, upper middle-income countries that feature comparatively sized economies and populations.2 In terms of their macroeconomic approaches, however, their policy stances 1Roberts and Levitsky, 2011; Weyland 2009; Lynch 2007; Castaneda, 2006; Panizza 2005"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aGlobalization _zLatin America.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=508897&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hHC _m2013 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a02 _bNT
999			_c96320 _d96320
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell