000 03508cam a2200397Mi 4500
001 ocn835787745
003 OCoLC
005 20240726105321.0
008 120719s2013 mau ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aCN8ML
_beng
_epn
_erda
_cCN8ML
_dOCLCO
_dVMC
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCO
_dCOO
_dYDXCP
_dNT
_dUMC
_dEMU
_dE7B
_dJSTOR
_dOCLCQ
_dEBLCP
_dDEBSZ
_dCUS
_dUIU
_dOCLCQ
_dBAL
_dAGLDB
_dMOR
_dMERUC
_dOCLCQ
_dJBG
_dOCLCQ
_dZCU
_dIOG
_dDEGRU
_dU3W
_dBUF
_dEZ9
_dSTF
_dWRM
_dVNS
_dOCLCQ
_dVTS
_dCOCUF
_dNRAMU
_dICG
_dBRX
_dVT2
_dOCLCQ
_dWYU
_dTKN
_dLEAUB
_dDKC
_dOCLCQ
_dM8D
_dOCLCQ
_dNJT
_dOCLCQ
_dMM9
_dINARC
_dOCLCO
_dHF9
020 _a9780674067561
043 _an-us---
050 0 0 _aKF4865
_b.D444 2013
049 _aMAIN
100 1 _aKoppelman, Andrew,
_e1
245 1 0 _aDefending American Religious Neutrality /Andrew Koppelman.
260 _aCambridge, Mass. :
_bHarvard University Press,
_c(c)2013.
300 _a1 online resource (248 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _adata file
_2rda
500 _aOldControl:harvard. 9780674067561.
530 _a2
_ub
504 _a2
505 0 0 _aThe American specification of neutrality --
_tCorruption of religion and the establishment clause --
_tReligion clause doctrine explained --
_tWhy single out religion? --
_tA secular state?
520 0 _a"Although it is often charged with hostility toward religion, First Amendment doctrine in fact treats religion as a distinctive human good. It insists, however, that this good be understood abstractly, without the state taking sides on any theological question. Here, a leading scholar of constitutional law explains the logic of this uniquely American form of neutrality--more religion-centered than liberal theorists propose, and less overtly theistic than conservatives advocate. The First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion is under threat. Growing numbers of critics, including a near-majority of the Supreme Court, seem ready to cast aside the ideal of American religious neutrality. Andrew Koppelman defends that ideal and explains why protecting religion from political manipulation is imperative in an America of growing religious diversity. Understanding American religious neutrality, Koppelman shows, can explain some familiar puzzles. How can Bible reading in public schools be impermissible while legislative sessions begin with prayers, Christmas is an official holiday, and the words "under God" appear in the Pledge of Allegiance? Are faith-based social services, public financing of religious schools, or the teaching of intelligent design constitutional? Combining legal, historical, and philosophical analysis, Koppelman shows how law coherently navigates these conundrums. He explains why laws must have a secular legislative purpose, why old, but not new, ceremonial acknowledgments of religion are permitted, and why it is fair to give religion special treatment."--Publisher's website.
650 0 _aChurch and state
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aEcclesiastical law
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aFreedom of religion
_zUnited States.
655 1 _aElectronic Books.
856 4 0 _uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=508387&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942 _cOB
_D
_eEB
_hKF
_m2013
_QOL
_R
_x
_8NFIC
_2LOC
994 _a92
_bNT
999 _c96275
_d96275
902 _a1
_bCynthia Snell
_c1
_dCynthia Snell