000 04396cam a2200577Ki 4500
001 ocn815276601
003 OCoLC
005 20240726105308.0
008 121029s2012 mau ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aNT
_beng
_epn
_erda
_cNT
_dYDXCP
_dUMC
_dOCLCQ
_dE7B
_dEMU
_dJSTOR
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dCN8ML
_dOCLCQ
_dEBLCP
_dOCL
_dOCLCQ
_dAZK
_dAGLDB
_dCOCUF
_dMOR
_dPIFAG
_dMERUC
_dOCLCQ
_dIOG
_dZCU
_dDEGRU
_dDEBSZ
_dCHVBK
_dS4S
_dDEBBG
020 _a9780674068117
_q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
043 _ae------
050 0 4 _aU22
_b.V473 2012
049 _aMAIN
100 1 _aWhitman, James Q.,
_d1957-
_e1
245 1 0 _aThe verdict of battle :
_bthe law of victory and the making of modern war /
_cJames Q. Whitman.
260 _aCambridge, Mass. :
_bHarvard University Press,
_c(c)2012.
300 _a1 online resource (323 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _adata file
_2rda
490 0 _aDe Gruyter eBook-Paket Rechtswissenschaften
504 _a2
505 0 0 _aWhy battles matter --
_tAccepting the wager of battle --
_tLaying just claim to the profits of war --
_tThe monarchical monopolization of military violence --
_tWere there really rules? --
_tThe death of pitched battle.
520 0 _aSlaughter in battle was once seen as a legitimate way to settle disputes. When pitched battles ceased to exist, the law of victory gave way to the rule of unbridled force. Whitman explains why ritualized violence was more effective in ending carnage, and why humanitarian laws that view war as evil have led to longer, more barbaric conflicts.
520 0 _aToday, war is considered a last resort for resolving disagreements. But a day of staged slaughter on the battlefield was once seen as a legitimate means of settling political disputes. James Whitman argues that pitched battle was essentially a trial with a lawful verdict. And when this contained form of battle ceased to exist, the law of victory gave way to the rule of unbridled force. The Verdict of Battle explains why the ritualized violence of the past was more effective than modern warfare in bringing carnage to an end, and why humanitarian laws that cling to a notion of war as evil have led to longer, more barbaric conflicts. Belief that sovereigns could, by rights, wage war for profit made the eighteenth century battle's golden age. A pitched battle was understood as a kind of legal proceeding in which both sides agreed to be bound by the result. To the victor went the spoils, including the fate of kingdoms. But with the nineteenth-century decline of monarchical legitimacy and the rise of republican sentiment, the public no longer accepted the verdict of pitched battles. Ideology rather than politics became war's just cause. And because modern humanitarian law provided no means for declaring a victor or dispensing spoils at the end of battle, the violence of war dragged on. The most dangerous wars, Whitman asserts in this iconoclastic tour de force, are the lawless wars we wage today to remake the world in the name of higher moral imperatives.
530 _a2
_ub
650 0 _aWar
_xMoral and ethical aspects.
650 0 _aCombat
_xMoral and ethical aspects.
650 0 _aBattles
_zEurope
_xHistory
_y18th century.
650 0 _aMilitary art and science
_zEurope
_xHistory
_y18th century.
650 0 _aWar (International law)
650 0 _aMilitary ethics
_xHistory
_y18th century.
650 0 _aMilitary history
_y18th century.
650 4 _aBattles
_zEurope
_vHistory
_y18th century.
650 4 _aCombat
_vMoral and ethical aspects.
650 4 _aInternational Law, Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
650 4 _aLaw.
650 4 _aMilitary art and science
_zEurope
_vHistory
_y18th century.
650 4 _aMilitary ethics
_vHistory
_y18th century.
650 4 _aMilitary history
_y18th century.
650 4 _aPublic International Law.
650 4 _aWar
_vMoral and ethical aspects.
653 _aMulti-User.
655 1 _aElectronic Books.
856 4 0 _uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=494493&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942 _cOB
_D
_eEB
_hU
_m2012
_QOL
_R
_x
_8NFIC
_2LOC
994 _a92
_bNT
999 _c95578
_d95578
902 _a1
_bCynthia Snell
_c1
_dCynthia Snell