000			03875cam a2200469 i 4500
001			ocn870272325
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105251.0
008			140210s2014 maua ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dYDXCP _dE7B _dHEBIS _dNHM _dOCLCO _dJSTOR _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dEBLCP _dOCLCQ _dDEBSZ _dOCLCO _dAGLDB _dMOR _dPIFAG _dZCU _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dJBG _dYDX _dMERER _dOCLCQ _dIOG _dOCLCO _dDEGRU _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dU3W _dEZ9 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dUUM _dSTF _dVTS _dOCLCQ _dNRAMU _dICG _dOCLCQ _dVT2 _dAU@ _dREC _dOCLCQ _dWYU _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dTKN _dDKC _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dM8D _dUWK _dSFB _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dINARC _dHS0 _dOCLCQ _dTUHNV _dOCLCO _dUKAHL _dDKU _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
020			_a9780674726369 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9780674727564
050	0	4	_aBF311 _b.N388 2014
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aTomasello, Michael, _e1
245	1	0	_aA natural history of human thinking /Michael Tomasello.
260			_aCambridge, Massachusetts : _bHarvard University Press, _c(c)2014.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 178 pages) : _billustrations
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aThe shared intentionality hypothesis -- _tIndividual intentionality -- _tJoint intentionality -- _tCollective intentionality -- _tHuman thinking as cooperation.
520	0		_a"Tool-making or culture, language or religious belief: ever since Darwin, thinkers have struggled to identify what fundamentally differentiates human beings from other animals. In this much-anticipated book, Michael Tomasello weaves his twenty years of comparative studies of humans and great apes into a compelling argument that cooperative social interaction is the key to our cognitive uniqueness. Once our ancestors learned to put their heads together with others to pursue shared goals, humankind was on an evolutionary path all its own. Tomasello argues that our prehuman ancestors, like today's great apes, were social beings who could solve problems by thinking. But they were almost entirely competitive, aiming only at their individual goals. As ecological changes forced them into more cooperative living arrangements, early humans had to coordinate their actions and communicate their thoughts with collaborative partners. Tomasello's 'shared intentionality hypothesis' captures how these more socially complex forms of life led to more conceptually complex forms of thinking. In order to survive, humans had to learn to see the world from multiple social perspectives, to draw socially recursive inferences, and to monitor their own thinking via the normative standards of the group. Even language and culture arose from the preexisting need to work together. What differentiates us most from other great apes, Tomasello proposes, are the new forms of thinking engendered by our new forms of collaborative and communicative interaction. A Natural History of Human Thinking is the most detailed scientific analysis to date of the connection between human sociality and cognition."--Publisher's description
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aCognition _xSocial aspects.
650		0	_aEvolutionary psychology.
650		0	_aPsychology, Comparative.
650		0	_aCognition.
650		0	_aThought and thinking.
650	1	2	_aCognition
650	2	2	_aThinking
650	2	2	_aIntention
650	2	2	_aCooperative Behavior
650	2	2	_aTheory of Mind
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=660118&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBF _m2014 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c94622 _d94622
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell