000			03162cam a22003737i 4500
001			on1285169794
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105154.0
008			211113s2021 paua ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aEBLCP _beng _erda _epn _cEBLCP _dNT _dP@U _dJSTOR _dOCLCF _dTOH _dTXM
020			_a9780822987680 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aQH442 _b.F674 2021
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aCrowe, Nathan, _e1
245	1	0	_aForgotten clones : _bthe birth of cloning and the biological revolution / _cNathan Crowe.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 299 pages) : _billustrations
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
500			_aDescription based upon print version of record.
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aPart I: Rethinking the origins of nuclear transplantation -- _tBeyond Spemann's "fantastical" experiment -- _tMaking the technique work for cancer -- _tPart II: The circulation of nuclear transplantation in the 1950s and 1960s -- _tA focus on potency -- _tNew uses for nuclear transplantation in practice and imagination -- _tPart III: The construction of nuclear transplantation as a bioethical problem -- _tNuclear transplantation and human cloning in the 1960s -- _tBioethics and the Biological Revolution.
520	0		_aLong before scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland cloned Dolly the sheep in 1996, American embryologist and aspiring cancer researcher Robert Briggs successfully developed the technique of nuclear transplantation using frogs in 1952. Although the history of cloning is often associated with contemporary ethical controversies, Forgotten Clones revisits the influential work of scientists like Briggs, Thomas King, and Marie DiBerardino, before the possibility of human cloning and its ethical implications first registered as a concern in public consciousness, and when many thought the very idea of cloning was experimentally impossible. By focusing instead on new laboratory techniques and practices and their place in Anglo-American science and society in the mid-twentieth century, Nathan Crowe demonstrates how embryos constructed in the lab were only later reconstructed as ethical problems in the 1960s and 1970s with the emergence of what was then referred to as the Biological Revolution. His book illuminates the importance of the early history of cloning for the biosciences and their institutional, disciplinary, and intellectual contexts, as well as providing new insights into the changing cultural perceptions of the biological sciences after Second World War.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aCloning _xHistory.
650		0	_aBiology _xSocial aspects.
650		0	_aGenetic engineering.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3091657&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hQH. _m2021 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c91472 _d91472
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell