000			03862cam a2200469Mi 4500
001			on1256996779
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105153.0
008			201123s2021 dcu o 000 0 eng d
010			_z2020034787
040			_aP@U _beng _erda _cP@U _dYDX _dEBLCP _dOCLCO _dJSTOR _dNT
020			_a9781647120924 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aBL65 _b.A378 2021
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aFlores, Nichole M., _e1
245	1	0	_aThe Aesthetics of Solidarity _bOur Lady of Guadalupe and American Democracy / _cNichole M. Flores.
260			_aBaltimore, Md. : _bProject MUSE, _c0000.
300			_a1 online resource (1 volume).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aMoral traditions
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aA Political Theology of Guadalupe and Juan Diego -- _tRawl's Liberal Imagination -- _tNussbaum's Liberal Aesthetics -- _tLifting Up the Lowly -- _tThe Aesthetic Dimension of Solidarity.
520	0		_a"Latinx Catholics have used Our Lady of Guadalupe as a symbol in democratic campaigns ranging from the United Farm Workers movement to the Chicano movement to the movement for just immigration reform. In diverse ways, these groups use Guadalupe's symbol and narrative to make claims about justice in society's basic structures (law, policy, institutions, for example) while seeking to generate greater participation and representation in US democracy. Yet, Guadalupe is illegible within a liberal political framework that seeks to protect society's basic structures from religious encroachment by relegating religious speech, practices, and symbols to the realm of the background culture. In response to this problem, religious ethicists have argued for expansions of the liberal framework that would make religious language, arguments, and practices communities legible within a pluralistic society without capitulating to anti-democratic modes of governance that undermine pluralism. What remains unexplored is the way that the aesthetic dimensions of particular religious traditions can be engaged toward cultivating a more participatory democracy that invites substantive contributions to society's common life from religious people and communities. Instead, in conversation with political liberalism, Latinx theological aesthetics, and Catholic social thought, The Aesthetics of Solidarity examines the use of particular religious symbols to make democratic claims and generate greater participation and presence in the life of US democracy. After evaluating liberalism's capacity for constructive engagement with religion toward strengthening democratic participation, the project employs Latinx theological aesthetics and Catholic social thought to offer a constructive framework for interpreting religious symbols in the context of a religiously pluralistic and participatory democratic life"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPolitical theology _zUnited States.
650		0	_aChristian sociology _xCatholic Church.
650		0	_aGuadalupe, Our Lady of.
650		0	_aSolidarity _xReligious aspects.
650		0	_aSolidarity _xPolitical aspects _zUnited States.
650		0	_aHispanic Americans _xPolitics and government.
650		0	_aHispanic Americans _xReligion.
650		0	_aReligion and politics _zUnited States.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aProject Muse. _edistributor.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2948646&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBL. _m2021 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c91380 _d91380
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell