000			03884cam a2200421 i 4500
001			on1196822697
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105149.0
008			200910s2021 scu ob 001 0 eng
010			_a2020041063
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dYDX _dEBLCP _dNT _dOCLCO _dP@U _dYDX _dJSTOR
020			_a9781643361703 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
043			_an-usu-- _an-us---
050	0	0	_aE645 _b.M668 2021
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aHartley, Roger C., _e1
245	1	0	_aMonumental harm : _breckoning with Jim Crow era Confederate monuments / _cRoger C. Hartley.
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
520	0		_a"Professor of Law at Catholic University Roger C. Hartley provides a thorough overview of the issue of Confederate monuments and their problematic presence on the American landscape. He examines and dissects competing claims regarding the removal of these monuments from public spaces ... mov[ing] readers through various debates on the subject ...with the compelling logic of a legal scholar ... methodically build[ing] the case that 'Confederate monuments harm contemporary American society by perpetuating antiblack racial stereotyping and systemic racism.' This harm, he continues, 'overrides even good faith claims to leave Confederate monuments undisturbed in order to preserve Southern heritage.' In the course of building this case for material harm, Hartley nonetheless offers his own good faith discussions of competing arguments for retaining Confederate monuments in situ. While these include 'heritage' claims, they also include those sometimes heard from historians and historic preservationists regarding the significance of monuments as teaching tools and the dangers of 'sanitizing' the historical landscape. While Hartley's argument ultimately makes a compelling case for removal/relocation as the optimal choice, he does not dismiss the alternative arguments. Instead, he deconstructs each and examines them for potential flaws in a way that will force readers to examine their own beliefs"-- _cProvided by publisher.
505	0	0	_aCover -- _tMONUMENTAL HARM -- _tTitle -- _tCopyright -- _tDedication -- _tContents -- _tList of Illustrations -- _tPreface -- _tAcknowledgments -- _tIntroduction -- _tPHASE I. Act or Leave the Monuments Undisturbed? -- _t1. History and Memory Distinguished -- _t2. The Distortion-of-History Approach: The Cult of the Lost Cause -- _t3. The Warping-of-History Approach: The Rise of Monument Mania -- _t4. The Racial-Reckoning Approach: The Stereotyping and Erasure Functions of Confederate Monuments -- _t5. Confederate Monuments and Contemporary Institutional Racism
505	0	0	_aPHASE II. The Disposition: Destroy, Contextualize, or Relocate the Confederate Monument? -- _t6. The Case Against Monument Destruction -- _t7. The Trouble with Contextualization -- _t8. Relocation and Its Critics -- _tPHASE III. Who Decides? -- _t9. The Legal Framework Protecting Confederate Monuments -- _tConclusion -- _tCases Cited -- _tNotes -- _tBibliography -- _tIndex
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aSoldiers' monuments _xSocial aspects _zSouthern States.
650		0	_aCollective memory _xSocial aspects _zSouthern States.
650		0	_aRacism _zSouthern States.
650		0	_aAfrican Americans _zSouthern States _xSocial conditions.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2662440&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hE _m2021 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c91130 _d91130
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell