000 | 03794cam a2200457 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | on1091236726 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105145.0 | ||
008 | 190401s2019 inu ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2019015519 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dYDX _dEBLCP _dYDX _dOCLCF _dP@U _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dNT _dCGN |
||
020 |
_a9780268105525 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
020 |
_a9780268105518 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 1 | 4 |
_aJK2260 _b.F736 2019 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aRoss, Robert E., _d1981- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe Framers' intentions : _bthe myth of the nonpartisan Constitution / _cRobert E. Ross. |
260 |
_aNotre Dame, Indiana : _bUniversity of Notre Dame Press, _c(c)2019. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource (viii, 273 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aAntipartyism and the Constitution : reassessing the Constitution-against-parties thesis -- _tAntiparty constitutionalism and the tradition of political parties -- _tPartyism prior to the Constitution -- _tPartyism and the First Amendment : organizing opposition and the partisan press -- _tPartyism and the presidential selection system : the Twelfth Amendment and political opposition -- _tPartyism and organized opposition in elections -- _tPartyism and the Electoral College : completing the Twelfth Amendment -- _tPartyism, the Elections Clause, and the House of Representatives -- _tPartyism and the Twenty-Fourth Amendment : entrenching the two-party Constitution. |
520 | 0 |
_a"Robert Ross addresses a fascinating and unresolved constitutional question: why did political parties emerge so quickly after the Framers designed the Constitution to prevent them? The text of the Constitution is silent on this question. Most scholars of the subject have taken that silence to be a hostile one, arguing that the adoption of the two-party system was a significant break from a long history of antiparty sentiments and institutional design aimed to circumscribe party politics. The constitutional question of parties addresses the very nature of representation, democracy, and majority rule. Political parties have become a vital institution of representation by linking the governed with the government. Efforts to uphold political parties have struggled to come to terms with the apparent antiparty sentiments of the founders and the perception that the Constitution was intended to work against parties. The Framers' Intentions connects political parties and the two-party system with the Constitution in a way that no previous account has, thereby providing a foundation for parties and a party system within American constitutionalism. This book will appeal to readers interested in political parties, constitutional theory, and constitutional development"-- _cPublisher's description. |
|
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States -- _tConstitution _n1st Amendment. |
610 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnited States -- _tConstitution _n12th Amendment. |
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical parties _zUnited States _xHistory _y18th century. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPolitical parties _zUnited States _xHistory _y19th century. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional history _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 | _aFounding Fathers of the United States. | |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2502107&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hJK _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c90925 _d90925 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |