000			03368cam a2200409 i 4500
001			on1138875648
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105138.0
008			200203s2019 gau ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dYDX _dEBLCP _dOCLCQ _dUKAHL _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dJSTOR
020			_a9780821446867 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
043			_ad------
050	0	4	_aJF60 _b.E958 2019
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aCarment, David, _d1959- _e1
245	1	0	_aExiting the fragility trap : _brethinking our approach to the world's most fragile states / _cDavid Carment and Yiagadeesen Samy.
260			_aAthens : _bOhio University Press, _c(c)2019.
300			_a1 online resource (xv, 230 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aSeries in human security
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aState fragility in a time of turmoil -- _tA typology of countries, with a focus on the fragility trap -- _tElites and the trap : drivers of change -- _tThe fragility trap : Yemen and Pakistan-the MIFFs -- _tIn and out of fragility : Mali and Laos-landlocked and unstable -- _tFragility exit : Bangladesh and Mozambique-a fine balance -- _tExplaining the fragility trap and what to do about it.
520	0		_a"State fragility is a much-debated yet underinvestigated concept in the development and international security worlds. Based on years of research as part of the Country Indicators for Foreign Policy project at Carleton University, Exiting the Fragility Trap marks a major step toward remedying the lack of research into the so-called fragility trap. In examining the nature and dynamics of state transitions in fragile contexts, with a special emphasis on states that are trapped in fragility, David Carment and Yiagadeesen Samy ask three questions: Why do some states remain stuck in a fragility trap? What lessons can we learn from those states that have successfully transitioned from fragility to stability and resilience? And how can third-party interventions support fragile state transitions toward resilience? Carment and Samy consider fragility's evolution in three state types: countries that are trapped, countries that move in and out of fragility, and countries that have exited fragility. Large-sample empirical analysis and six comparative case studies-Pakistan and Yemen (trapped countries), Mali and Laos (in and out countries), and Bangladesh and Mozambique (exited countries)-drive their investigation, which breaks ground toward a new understanding of why some countries fail to see sustained progress over time"-- _cProvided by publisher
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPolitical stability _zDeveloping countries _vCase studies.
650		0	_aLegitimacy of governments _zDeveloping countries _vCase studies.
650		0	_aNation-building _zDeveloping countries _vCase studies.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aSamy, Yiagadeesen, _e1
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2362931&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hJF _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c90506 _d90506
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell