000			03020cam a2200373Ii 4500
001			on1121074921
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105133.0
008			190927s2019 pau ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dNT _dEBLCP _dP@U _dOCLCQ _dJSTOR
020			_a9780822987017 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
043			_an-usa--
050	0	4	_aTJ163 _b.U563 2019
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aCamp, Michael, _e1
245	1	0	_aUnnatural resources : _benergy and environmental politics in Appalachia after the 1973 oil embargo / _cMichael Camp.
260			_aPittsburgh: _bUniversity of Pittsburgh Press, _c(c)2019.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aIntroduction. A joke told too many times -- _t"Little bitty cars" : the Department of Energy, oil decontrol, and the anticonservation backlash -- _t"Rich, black veins of the future" : the United Mine Workers, railroad deregulation, and the political economy of coal -- _t"The model-t of reactors" : the Clinch River Breeder Reactor debate in Congress -- _t"Deliberately inflexible" : the Tellico Dam and endangered species law -- _t"Hit by inflation like everyone else" : the Tennessee Valley Authority in the era of the market.
520	0		_aUnnatural Resources explores the intersection of energy production and environmental regulation in Appalachia after the oil embargo of 1973. The years from 1969 to 1973 saw the passage of a number of laws meant to protect the environment from human destruction, and they initially enjoyed broad public popularity. However, the oil embargo, which caused lines and fistfights at gasoline stations, refocused Americans' attention on economic issues and alerted Americans to the dangers of relying on imported oil. As a drive to increase domestic production of energy gained momentum, it soon appeared that new environmental regulations were inhibiting this initiative. A backlash against environmental regulations helped inaugurate a bipartisan era of market-based thinking in American politics and discredited the idea that the federal government had a constructive role to play in addressing energy issues. This study connects political, labor, and environmental history to contribute to a growing body of literature on the decline of the New Deal and the rise of pro-market thinking in American politics.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPower resources _zAppalachian Region.
650		0	_aEnvironmental policy _zAppalachian Region.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2255770&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hTJ.. _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c90206 _d90206
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell