000			03609cam a2200421Ki 4500
001			on1114600408
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105124.0
008			190830s2019 nyu ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dEBLCP _dOCLCF _dJSTOR
020			_a9780231548250 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
043			_an-us---
050	0	4	_aJA74 _b.D577 2019
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aSydnor, Emily, _e1
245	1	0	_aDisrespectful democracy : _bthe psychology of political incivility / _cEmily Sydnor.
260			_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c(c)2019.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aThe political psychology of conflict communication -- _tTo laugh or cry? : emotional responses to incivility -- _tChoosing outrage : selective posure and information search -- _tMimicry and temper tantrums : political discussion and engagement -- _tConclusion : a more disrespectfuldDemocracy? -- _tAppendix 1: Additional study information -- _tAppendix 2: Statistical models and results.
520	0		_a"The majority of Americans think that politics has an "incivility problem," and that the problem has only gotten worse. Research demonstrates that negativity and incivility in politics have been increasing since the 1980s. Citizens underestimate, however, the impact that this uncivil tide has on their own reactions to political media coverage and on their political behavior. While political scientists have pointed to positive and negative effects of uncivil political communication, they assume that these behavioral changes are similar across all individuals. This book complicates the relationship between incivility and political behavior by introducing a key individual predisposition--conflict orientation. Political psychologist Emily Sydnor argues that individuals experience conflict in different ways; some enjoy arguments while others are uncomfortable and avoid face-to-face confrontation whenever possible. Using six primary surveys and survey experiments, and supplementing with additional data, she examines the behavioral effects of the interaction between conflict orientation and incivility. Specifically, she argues that this interaction affects how citizens engage with politics and political information in three primary ways: an affective response, producing divergent emotional responses to uncivil messages; the information-search, where anxiety and anger lead the conflict-avoidant to seek out more of the very thing they want to avoid, more uncivil political media; and engagement, where the conflict-avoidant pull away from political activities like protests and calls to their Congressperson whereas the conflict-approaching jump in"-- _cProvided by publisher.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPolitical psychology _zUnited States.
650		0	_aPolitical culture _zUnited States.
650		0	_aInterpersonal conflict.
650		0	_aInterpersonal confrontation.
650		0	_aDemocracy _xPsychological aspects.
650		0	_aCommunication in politics _xPsychological aspects.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2099584&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hJA. _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c89788 _d89788
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell