000			03552cam a2200433 i 4500
001			on1054266663
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105121.0
008			180920t20192019nyuab ob 001 0 eng
010			_a2018045311
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dNT _dYDX _dJSTOR _dEBLCP _dUAB _dYDX _dP@U _dDEGRU _dMERER _dOCLCA _dBRX _dOCL _dOCLCQ _dUKAHL _dOCL _dOCLCQ _dMM9 _dOCLCQ
020			_a9781501736148 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9781501736155 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
043			_ae-ur--- _aa-tu---
050	1	4	_aJN6520 _b.E475 2019
049			_aMAIN
245	1	0	_aEmpire and belonging in the Eurasian borderlands /edited by Krista A. Goff and Lewis H. Siegelbaum.
260			_aIthaca, New York : _bCornell University Press, _c(c)2019.
300			_a1 online resource (ix, 266 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aIntroduction : belonging in the Eurasian borderlands : interrogating nation and empire / _rKrista A. Goff and Lewis H. Siegelbaum -- _tNegations of belonging -- _tBelonging via standardization -- _tBelonging and myth-making.
520	0		_a"The various chapters in this volurne address questions of belonging in multiethnic, bounded political spaces. They range across the Ottoman Empire in Anatolia, Kemalist Turkey, Imperial Russia, and the Soviet Union, from the mid-19th to the late 20th centuries. The first section focuses on eliminations: the taking of Geok-Tepe, stronghold of the Tekke Turkmen, in 1881 and the Russian empire's expansion into Central Asia; the 1916 revolt in Semirech'e (in modem-day Kazakhstan); the Armenian genocide viewed in comparative perspective; and expulsions in the postwar Caucasus. The second looks at imperial standardization: in Soviet Armenia, modernizing state officials accommodated Armenian linguistic and cultural particularities as local actors debated the terms of Sovietization; meanwhile, the Tatar lexical revolution was inspired by Soviet attempts to enlighten 'backward peoples.' The third part looks at connections between belonging and myth making: the origins of the notion of a "Sovetskii Narod" in the experience of the Great Patriotic War; Gamsakhurdia's assertion of Georgia's status as a quintessential and foundational European nation. The various contributions to the book illustrate both the mutability and the durability of imperial belonging in the Eurasian borderlands. Once considered part of the 'Eastern Question, ' the minority peoples of the Russian/Soviet and Ottoman empires are shown to have had their own longings and identities; their capacity to push back against but also selectively absorb imperial initiatives makes them fascinating subjects of belonging"-- _cProvided by publisher
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aMinorities _xGovernment policy _zSoviet Union.
650		0	_aMinorities _xGovernment policy _zRussia.
650		0	_aMinorities _xGovernment policy _zTurkey.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aGoff, Krista A., _e5
700	1		_aSiegelbaum, Lewis H., _e5
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2084008&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hJN. _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c89615 _d89615
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell