000 | 02917cam a2200433Ii 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | on1085349364 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105119.0 | ||
008 | 190211s2017 mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dOCLCO _dMUU |
||
020 |
_a9780674972728 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aBJ1533 _b.M474 2017 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBejan, Teresa M., _d1984- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMere civility : _bdisagreement and the limits of toleration / _cTeresa M. Bejan. |
260 |
_aCambridge, Mass. : _bHarvard University Press, _c(c)2017. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource (x, 272 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
500 | _aBased on the author's thesis (Ph. D.--Yale University, 2013). | ||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aIntroduction: Wars of words -- _t"Persecution of the tongue" -- _t"Silver alarums": Roger Williams's "meer" civility -- _t"If it be without contention": Hobbes and civil silence -- _t"A bond of mutual charity": Locke and the quest for concord -- _tConclusion: The virtue of mere civility -- _tEpilogue: Free speech fundamentalism. |
520 | 0 |
_aCivility is often treated as an essential virtue in liberal democracies that promise to protect diversity as well as active disagreement in the public sphere. Yet the fear that our tolerant society faces a crisis of incivility is gaining ground. Politicians and public intellectuals call for "more civility" as the solution--but is civility really a virtue? Or is it something more sinister--a covert demand for conformity that silences dissent? Mere Civility sheds light on this tension in contemporary political theory and practice by examining similar appeals to civility in early modern debates about religious toleration. In seventeenth-century England, figures as different as Roger Williams, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke could agree that some restraint on the wars of words and "persecution of the tongue" between sectarians would be required; and yet, they recognized that the prosecution of incivility was often difficult to distinguish from persecution.-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 |
_aCourtesy _xPolitical aspects. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aToleration _xPolitical aspects. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aDiscussion _xPolitical aspects. |
|
650 | 0 | _aFreedom of speech. | |
650 | 0 |
_aForums (Discussion and debate) _xHistory. |
|
650 | 4 | _aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / | |
650 | 4 | _aPHILOSOPHY / | |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2024359&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hBJ. _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c89464 _d89464 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |