000 | 03397cam a22004098i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | on1039313268 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105116.0 | ||
008 | 180601t20192019cau ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2018026660 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dNT _dEBLCP _dJSTOR |
||
020 |
_a9780520968172 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 1 | 0 |
_aHQ32 _b.S374 2019 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aFischel, Joseph J., _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aScrew consent : _ba better politics of sexual justice / _cJoseph J. Fischel. |
260 |
_aOakland, California : _bUniversity of California Press, _c(c)2019. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aIntroduction : when consent isn't sexy -- _tKink and cannibals, or why we should probably ban American football -- _tThe trouble with mothers's boyfriends, or against uncles -- _tThe trouble with transgender "Rapists" -- _tHorses and corpses : notes on the wrongness of sex with children, the inappositeness of consent, and the weirdness of heterosomething masculinity -- _tCripping consent : autonomy and access with Hilary O'Connell -- _tConclusion : #MeFirst : undemocratic hedonism. |
520 | 0 | _a"When we think of sex--good sex, bad sex, sexual assault, rape law, or university sexual misconduct policies--we so often turn to consent as both our moral and erotic savior. What counts as sexual consent? How can we make consent sexy? How do we teach consent to impressionable youth, potential predators, and victims alike? What if these are all the wrong questions? Screw Consent is a provocative take on consent and whether its place at the center of sexual politics and sex law is warranted. The book takes aim at sex imagined at the center of our moral universe: adult, coupled, consensual. By spotlighting sex on the periphery--bestial, necrophilic, kinky, cannibalistic--Screw Consent shows that sex on the margins confounds the ethical force of consent much further than we anticipate. Author Joseph J. Fischel fervently argues that the consent paradigm of sexual politics is profoundly flawed. In addition to the criticisms against consent leveled by feminist theorists of earlier generations, Fischel elevates three more: consent is insufficient, inapposite, and riddled with scope contradictions for regulating and imagining sex. We can do so much better than consent in our sexual politics. Fischel contends that sexual justice turns more productively on concepts of autonomy and access rather than consent. Cleverly humorous and adeptly researched, Screw Consent will have a significant impact on how we understand consent, sexuality, and law in the U.S. today"--Provided by publisher. | |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 | _aSexual consent. | |
650 | 0 |
_aSex _xPolitical aspects. |
|
650 | 0 | _aSexual ethics. | |
650 | 0 | _aSex and law. | |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1949511&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hHQ _m2019 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c89290 _d89290 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |