000 | 03390cam a22004218i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn952470801 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105104.0 | ||
008 | 160627s2017 nyu ob 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2016030062 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dYDX _dJSTOR _dTEFOD _dRECBK _dEBLCP _dIDEBK _dCSAIL _dTJC _dBOL _dOCLCQ _dIHT _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dIOG _dSAA _dDEBBG _dIDB _dDEGRU _dOCLCF _dOCLCO _dNT |
||
020 |
_a9780231542913 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 1 | 0 |
_aQM608 _b.E974 2017 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHurlbut, J. Benjamin, _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aExperiments in democracy : _bhuman embryo research and the politics of bioethics / _cJ. Benjamin Hurlbut. |
260 |
_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c(c)2017. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aIntroduction: the politics of experiment -- _tNew beginnings -- _tProducing life -- _tRepresenting reason -- _tCloning, knowledge, and the politics of consensus -- _tConfusing deliberation -- _tIn the laboratories of democracy -- _tReligion, reason, and the politics of progress -- _tThe legacy of experiment. |
520 | 0 | _aHuman embryo research touches upon strongly felt moral convictions, and it raises such deep questions about the promise and perils of scientific progress that debate over its development has become a moral and political imperative. From in vitro fertilization to embryonic stem cell research, cloning, and gene editing, Americans have repeatedly struggled with how to define the moral status of the human embryo, whether to limit its experimental uses, and how to contend with sharply divided public moral perspectives on governing science. Experiments in Democracy presents a history of American debates over human embryo research from the late 1960s to the present, exploring their crucial role in shaping norms, practices, and institutions of deliberation governing the ethical challenges of modern bioscience. J. Benjamin Hurlbut details how scientists, bioethicists, policymakers, and other public figures have attempted to answer a question of great consequence: how should the public reason about aspects of science and technology that effect fundamental dimensions of human life' Through a study of one of the most significant science policy controversies in the history of the United States, Experiments in Democracy paints a portrait of the complex relationship between science and democracy, and of U.S. society's evolving approaches to evaluating and governing science's most challenging breakthroughs. | |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 |
_aHuman embryo _xResearch _xGovernment policy _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aStem cells _xResearch _xMoral and ethical aspects _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 1 | 2 |
_aEmbryo Research _xethics. |
650 | 2 | 2 |
_aStem Cell Research _xethics. |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1821408&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hQM _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c88618 _d88618 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |