000 | 02807nam a2200361Ki 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | on1014329231 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105050.0 | ||
008 | 171208s2017 nyu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT |
||
020 |
_a9780231545457 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aB53 _b.T355 2017 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aVan Norden, Bryan W. _q(Bryan William), _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTaking back philosophy : _ba multicultural manifesto / _cBryan W. Van Norden. |
260 |
_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c(c)2017. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource. | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
520 | 8 | _aAre American colleges and universities failing their students by refusing to teach the philosophical traditions of China, India, Africa, and other non-Western cultures? This biting and provocative critique of American higher education says yes. Even though we live in an increasingly multicultural world, most philosophy departments stubbornly insist that only Western philosophy is real philosophy and denigrate everything outside the European canon. In Taking Back Philosophy, Bryan W. Van Norden lambastes academic philosophy for its Eurocentrism, insularity, and complicity with nationalism and issues a ringing call to make our educational institutions live up to their cosmopolitan ideals. In a cheeky, agenda-setting, and controversial style, Van Norden, an expert in Chinese philosophy, proposes an inclusive, multicultural approach to philosophical inquiry. He showcases several accessible examples of how Western and Asian thinkers can be brought into productive dialogue, demonstrating that philosophy only becomes deeper as it becomes increasingly diverse and pluralistic. Taking Back Philosophy is at once a manifesto for multicultural education, an accessible introduction to Confucian and Buddhist philosophy, a critique of the ethnocentrism and anti-intellectualism characteristic of much contemporary American politics, a defense of the value of philosophy and a liberal arts education, and a call to return to the search for the good life that defined philosophy for Confucius, Socrates, and the Buddha. | |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 | _aPhilosophy-Ancient | |
650 | 0 | _aPhilosophy. | |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
690 | _aPhilosophy-Ancient | ||
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1628845&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hB _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c87869 _d87869 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |