000 | 03692cam a22003858i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn985966077 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105043.0 | ||
008 | 170503t20172017quca ob 001 0 eng | ||
040 |
_aNLC _beng _erda _epn _cNLC _dOCLCF _dIDEBK _dNT _dJSTOR _dMERUC _dW2U _dCELBN _dK6U _dBTN _dSNK _dUAB _dNLC _dOCLCO _dCNCGM _dOCLCQ _dCEF _dJBG _dIGB _dOCLCQ _dAUW _dMHW _dINTCL _dOTZ _dAU@ _dG3B _dS8I _dS8J _dS9I _dSTF _dD6H _dAGLDB _dCNTRU _dM8D _dYDX _dMM9 _dVLB _dOCLCQ _dWAU |
||
015 |
_a20179024507 _2can |
||
016 | _a(AMICUS)000045148530 | ||
016 | _z20179024493 (print) | ||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aBJ1500 _b.M673 2017 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMurray, R. Malcolm _q(Robert Malcolm), _d1959- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMorals and consent : _bcontractarian solutions to ethical worries / _cMalcolm Murray. |
260 |
_aMontreal ; _aKingston ; _aLondon ; _aChicago : _bMcGill-Queen's University Press, _c(c)2017. |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource (xii, 398 pages) : _billustrations |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aThe consent principle -- _tGame theory, evolution, and metaethics -- _tContractarian lineage -- _tEuthanasia : end-of-life choices -- _tAbortion : fetuses and rights -- _tThe death penalty : killing killers -- _tSex trades -- _tUnwanted sexual offers -- _tPrejudice and affirmative action -- _tDuties of beneficence? -- _tAnimals and obligations -- _tThe environment and its future tenants -- _tGenetic meddling and organ sales -- _tTerrorism and torture -- _tBlackmail and imprudence. |
520 | 0 |
_a"How ought we to behave? More importantly, how are we to defend whatever answer we give? Concerning the second question, most people presuppose unsupported metaphysics. In contrast, Morals and Consent grounds our notion of morality in natural evolution, and from that basis, Malcolm Murray shows why contractarianism is a far more viable moral theory than presently credited. The scope of Morals and Consent has two main parts: theory and application. In the theory part, Murray defends contractarianism by appeal to evolutionary game theory and metaethical analyses. The main idea is that we are not going to find morality as an objective fact in the world. Instead, we can understand morality as a reciprocal cooperative trait. From this minimal moral architecture, Murray derives his innovative consent principle. The application of the theory, detailing what contractarians can--or ought to--say about moral matters, takes up the greater percentage of the work. Murray offers a trenchant examination of what moral constraints we can claim concerning death (abortion, euthanasia, and capital punishment), sex (pornography, prostitution, and sexual assault), beneficence (toward present and future people, animals, and the environment), and liberty (genetic enhancement, organ sales, and torture). Murray's Morals and Consent is a serious and utterly unique advance in the field of applied ethics. By focussing on the epistemic justification of our moral claims--or the lack thereof--Murray's evolutionary contractarianism fills a welcome niche in the field of applied ethics."-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 | _aContractarianism (Ethics) | |
650 | 0 | _aEthics. | |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1564659&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hBJ. _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c87485 _d87485 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |