000			03646cam a2200457 i 4500
001			ocn957581543
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105036.0
008			160830s2017 dcu ob 001 0 eng
010			_a2016040083
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dP@U _dNT _dJSTOR _dYDX _dEBLCP _dIDEBK _dYDX _dOCLCO _dMERUC _dOCLCQ _dOTZ _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dIOG _dMERER _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dUAB _dWRM _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dIGB _dAUW _dBTN _dMHW _dINTCL _dSNK _dINT _dOCLCQ _dG3B _dS8I _dS8J _dTKN _dOCLCQ _dS9I _dSTF _dD6H _dAGLDB _dOCLCQ _dMM9 _dOCLCO
020			_a9781626164055 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
050	1	4	_aJZ5865 _b.B567 2017
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aEnemark, Christian, _e1
245	1	0	_aBiosecurity dilemmas : _bdreaded diseases, ethical responses, and the health of nations / _cChristian Enemark.
260			_aWashington, DC : _bGeorgetown University Press, _c(c)2017.
300			_a1 online resource (xxii, 203 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aProtect or proliferate. Biodefense and the security dilemma ; Vertical proliferation and threats from within -- _tSecure or stifle. Laboratory biosecurity ; Export and publication controls -- _tRemedy or overkill. Social distancing and national security ; Border security and transnational contagion -- _tAttention or neglect. The agenda of global health security ; Public health and biodefense priorities.
520	0		_aBiosecurity Dilemmas examines conflicting values and interests in the practice of "biosecurity," the safeguarding of populations against infectious diseases through security policies. Biosecurity encompasses both the natural occurrence of deadly disease outbreaks and the deliberate or accidental release of biological weapons. Enemark focuses on six dreaded diseases that are given high-priority by governments and international organizations for research, regulation, surveillance, and rapid response: pandemic influenza, drug-resistant tuberculosis, smallpox, Ebola virus, bubonic plague, and anthrax. The book is organized around four ethical dilemmas that arise when fear causes these diseases to be framed in terms of national or international security: protect or proliferate, secure or stifle, remedy or overkill, and attention or neglect. For instance, will prioritizing research into defending against a rare event such as a bioterrorist attack divert funds away from research into commonly occurring diseases? Or will securitizing a particular disease actually stifle research progress due to security classification measures? Enemark provides a comprehensive analysis of the ethics of securitizing disease and explores ideas and policy recommendations about biological arms control, global health security, and public health ethics.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aBiosecurity.
650		0	_aBiosecurity _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aBioterrorism _xPrevention.
650		0	_aCommunicable diseases.
650		0	_aBiological arms control.
650		0	_aPublic health _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aNational security.
650		0	_aHazardous substances _xRisk assessment.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1463860&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hJZ. _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c87034 _d87034
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell