000 | 02879cam a2200421Ii 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn962753105 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105032.0 | ||
008 | 161116s2016 mau ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dNT _dEBLCP _dJSTOR |
||
020 |
_a9780674974739 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aKF5425 _b.L397 2016 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aVermeule, Adrian, _d1968- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLaw's abnegation : _bfrom law's empire to the administrative state / _cAdrian Vermeule. |
260 |
_aCambridge, Massachusetts : _bHarvard University Press, _c(c)2016. |
||
300 | _a1 online resource (254 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
520 | 0 |
_a"Ronald Dworkin once imagined law as an empire and judges as its princes. But over time, the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state. Adrian Vermeule argues that law has freely abandoned its imperial pretensions, and has done so for internal legal reasons. In area after area, judges and lawyers, working out the logical implications of legal principles, have come to believe that administrators should be granted broad leeway to set policy, determine facts, interpret ambiguous statutes, and even define the boundaries of their own jurisdiction. Agencies have greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront many issues than lawyers and judges do. And as the questions confronting the state involving climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology (to name a few) have become ever more complex, legal logic increasingly indicates that abnegation is the wisest course of action"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aIntroduction : The abnegation of law's empire -- _tThe legality of administrative law -- _tSeparation of powers without idolatry -- _tDeference and due process -- _tRationally arbitrary decisions -- _tThin rationality review -- _tAppendix to Chapter 5 -- _tHow law empowers nonlawyers -- _tConclusion : Law on the margin. |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial review of administrative acts _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAdministrative discretion _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAdministrative agencies _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAdministrative law _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAdministrative procedure _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aRule of law _zUnited States. |
|
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1416417&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hKF _m2016 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c86754 _d86754 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |