000			04156cam a2200481 i 4500
001			ocn933596346
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105021.0
008			151231s2016 inu ob 001 0 eng
010			_a2015051468
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dCLU _dYDXCP _dEBLCP _dNT _dWAU _dIDEBK _dP@U _dNT _dYDX _dIDB _dOTZ _dOCLCQ _dCOCUF _dCCO _dMERUC _dSTF _dCNNOR _dZCU _dK6U _dU3W _dD6H _dWRM _dOCLCQ _dICG _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dWYU _dG3B _dLVT _dTKN _dOCLCQ _dIGB _dOCLCQ _dDKC _dOCLCQ _dYDX _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dVT2 _dUKAHL _dUX1 _dOCLCA _dJSTOR
020			_a9781612494340 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9781612494357 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
043			_an-us--- _an-cn---
050	1	4	_aK564 _b.P487 2016
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aHunter, Susan, _d1947 April 13- _e1
245	1	0	_aPet politics : _bthe political and legal lives of cats, dogs, and horses in Canada and the United States / _cSusan Hunter and Richard A. Brisbin, Jr.
260			_aWest Lafayette, Indiana : _bPurdue University Press, _c(c)2016.
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aNew directions in the human-animal bond
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aWhy study pet politics? -- _tThe evolution of pet policy -- _tWhat is a pet? popular conceptions of animals and the pet policy agenda -- _tThe formation of a pet policy agenda: activists and organized interests -- _tMaking pet policy: anti-cruelty laws -- _tMaking pet policy: kennel licensing legislation -- _tMaking pet policy: the disposition of unwanted horses -- _tMaking pet policy: roaming and feral cats -- _tMaking pet policy: breed-specific laws -- _tThe enforcement of pet legislation -- _tConclusion: the meaning of pet politics and policy.
520	0		_a"Although scholars in the disciplines of law, psychology, philosophy, and sociology have published a considerable number of prescriptive, normative, and theoretical studies of animals in society, Pet Politics presents the first study of the development of companion animal or pet law and policy in Canada and the United States by political scientists. The authors examine how people and governments classify three species of pets or companion animals--cats, dogs, and horses--for various degrees of legal protection. They then detail how interest groups shape the agenda for companion animal legislation and regulation, and the legislative and administrative formulation of anticruelty, kennel licensing, horse slaughter, feral and roaming cat, and breed ban policies. Finally, they examine the enforcement of these laws and policies by agencies and the courts. Using an eclectic mix of original empirical data, original case studies, and interviews--and relying on general theories and research about the policy process and the sociopolitical function of legality--the authors illustrate that pet policy is a unique field of political struggle, a conflict that originates from differing perspectives about whether pets are property or autonomous beings, and clashing norms about the care of animals. The result of the political struggle, the authors argue, is difficulty in the enactment of policies and especially in the implementation and enforcement of laws that might improve the welfare of companion animals"--Provided by publisher.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPets _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aPets _xSocial aspects.
650		0	_aPets _xLaw and legislation _zUnited States.
650		0	_aPets _xSocial aspects _zUnited States.
650		0	_aPets _xLaw and legislation _zCanada.
650		0	_aPets _xSocial aspects _zCanada.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aBrisbin, Richard A., _e1
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1228434&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hK. _m2016 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c86156 _d86156
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell