000			03541cam a22004218i 4500
001			ocn919014185
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105014.0
008			150812s2015 quc ob 001 0 eng
040			_aNLC _beng _erda _cNLC _dOCLCF _dNT _dYDXCP _dEBLCP _dTEFOD _dJBG _dYDX _dIDB _dAGLDB _dLOA _dCOCUF _dICA _dK6U _dCCO _dPIFAG _dFVL _dWYZ _dZCU _dMERUC _dIGP _dU3W _dD6H _dNLC
015			_a20159056276 _2can
016			_a(AMICUS)000043944227
043			_an-cn---
050	0	4	_aKE8928 _b.I475 2015
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aPlaxton, Michael, _d1975-, _e1
245	1	0	_aImplied consent and sexual assault : _bintimate relationships, autonomy, and voice / _cMichael Plaxton.
260			_aMontreal ; _aKingston : _bMcGill-Queen's University Press, _c(c)2015.
300			_a1 online resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
520	0		_a"In R. v. Ewanchuk, the Supreme Court of Canada held that sexual touching must be accompanied by express, contemporaneous consent. In doing so, the Court rejected the idea that sexual consent could be 'implied'. Ewanchuk was a landmark ruling, reflecting a powerful commitment to women's equality and sexual autonomy. In articulating limits on the circumstances under which women can be said to 'consent' to sexual touching, however, the decision also restricts their autonomy--specifically, by denying them a voice in determining the norms that should govern their intimate relationships and sexual lives. In Implied Consent and Sexual Assault, Michael Plaxton argues that women should have the autonomy to decide whether, and under what circumstances, sexual touching can be appropriate in the absence of express consent. Though we should exercise caution before resurrecting a limited doctrine of implied consent in the sexual sphere, there are reasons to think that sexual assault law could accommodate it without undermining the sexual autonomy or equality rights of women. In reaching this conclusion, Plaxton challenges widespread beliefs about autonomy, consent, and the objectives underpinning the offence of sexual assault in Canada. Drawing upon a range of contemporary criminal law theorists and feminist scholars, Implied Consent and Sexual Assault reconsiders the nature of mutuality in a world dominated by gender norms, the proper scope of criminal law, and the true meaning of sexual autonomy."-- _cProvided by publisher.
505	0	0	_tCriminal law's expressive function -- _tWrong of sexual assault -- _tImplied consent and Ewanchuk -- _tAutonomy and section 273.1(1) -- _tMutuality and sexual instrumentalization -- _tExit, voice, and mutuality -- _tWhat is stereotyping? -- _tContext and the marital rape exception -- _tValue of assurance -- _tOverbreadth or bust? -- _tVoice and implied consent.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aSexual consent _zCanada.
650		0	_aRape _xLaw and legislation _zCanada.
650		0	_aSex crimes _xLaw and legislation _zCanada.
650		0	_aWomen _xLegal status, laws, etc. _zCanada.
650		0	_aMan-woman relationships _zCanada.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1141226&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hKE _m2015 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c85761 _d85761
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell