000 | 05576cam a2200529 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn936205674 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105011.0 | ||
008 | 160127s2016 ilua ob s001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2016004102 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dNT _dYDXCP _dIDEBK _dJSTOR _dP@U _dEBLCP _dVT2 _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dIDB _dCOD _dIOG _dUBY _dJBG _dOCLCO _dAGLDB _dIAT _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dYDX _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dICA _dOCLCO _dXFH _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dMERUC _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dUPM _dEZ9 _dOCLCO _dSNK _dD6H _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dYDX _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dVNS _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dVTS _dINT _dAU@ _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dTKN _dSTF _dMQY _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dMM9 _dUX1 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dINARC _dOCLCO |
||
020 |
_a9780252098444 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 1 | 4 |
_aGV709 _b.S498 2016 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPieper, Lindsay Parks, _d1985- _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSex testing : _bgender policing in women's sports / _cLindsay Parks Pieper. |
260 |
_aUrbana : _bUniversity of Illinois Press, _c(c)2016. |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource (x, 250 pages) : _billustrations. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
490 | 1 | _aSport and society | |
520 | 0 |
_a"In 1968, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) implemented sex testing for female athletes at that year's Games. When it became clear that testing regimes failed to delineate a sex divide, the IOC began to test for gender --a shift that allowed the organization to control the very idea of womanhood. Lindsay Parks Pieper explores sex testing in sport from the 1930s to the early 2000s. Focusing on assumptions and goals as well as means, Pieper examines how the IOC in particular insisted on a misguided binary notion of gender that privileged Western norms. Testing evolved into a tool to identify--and eliminate--athletes the IOC deemed too strong, too fast, or too successful. Pieper shows how this system punished gifted women while hindering the development of women's athletics for decades. She also reveals how the flawed notions behind testing--ideas often sexist, racist, or ridiculous--degraded the very idea of female athleticism"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
520 | 0 |
_a"To assess the long-lasting significance of sex testing in sport, this book explores its history, from the 1930s to the early 2000s, with particular emphasis on the International Olympic Committee's mandated compulsory sex checks on all female competitors. In 1968 the Medical Commission implemented the first test of the modern Olympic Movement. The procedure intended to guarantee the authenticity of Olympic competitors and identify male masqueraders, as well as to scientifically confirm the separation of men and women in athletic competition. Although the Medical Commission never discovered a single male imposter, and the test illustrated the impossibility of determining the exact constitution of woman, the IOC maintained the policy for three decades. With both the impossibility of discovering a clear sex divide and the increased presence of female dopers, the IOC adjusted its semantic framework to encapsulate gender normativity. The conspicuous adjustment from sex to gender underscored the Medical Commission's changing anxieties. Rather than to catch men disguised as women, the test evolved into a measure to preclude female Olympians with biological advantages. In other words, the Medical Commission eventually viewed gender verification as a tool to eliminate competitors it deemed too strong, too fast or too successful for women's competition. Olympic womanhood--dependent on a belief in natural, dichotomous sex/gender difference--required female athletes to conform to conventional notions of white, Western femininity. Through these regulations, the IOC has continuously reaffirmed a binary notion of sex, privileged white gender norms and hampered female athleticism"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
504 | _a2 | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_a"A careful inquiry to establish her sex beyond a doubt": sex/gender anxieties in track and field -- _t"Because they have muscles, big ones": Cold War gender norms and international sport, 1952-1967 -- _tIs the athlete "right" or "wrong"? The IOC's chromosomal construction of womanhood, 1968-1972 -- _t"East Germany's mighty sports machine": Steroids, nationalism, and femininity testing -- _tUS vs. USSR: Gender testing, doping checks, and Olympic boycotts -- _t"One of the most horrid misuses of a scientific method": The development of a protest -- _t"Gender testing per se is no longer necessary": The IAAF's and the IOC's continued control -- _tEpilogue: The reintroduction of gender verification. |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
610 | 2 | 0 | _aIOC Medical Commission. |
650 | 0 |
_aWomen athletes _xPhysiology. |
|
650 | 0 | _aSex discrimination in sports. | |
650 | 0 |
_aSports _xSex differences. |
|
650 | 0 | _aGender identity. | |
650 | 0 | _aSex differences. | |
650 | 1 | 2 | _aAthletes |
650 | 1 | 2 | _aAthletic Performance |
650 | 2 | 2 | _aGender Identity |
650 | 2 | 2 | _aRacism |
650 | 2 | 2 | _aSex Characteristics |
650 | 2 | 2 | _aSexism |
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1100887&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hGV _m2016 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c85560 _d85560 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |