000 | 03559cam a2200397Ii 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn911665844 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726105000.0 | ||
008 | 140916s2015 ilua ob 001 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aP@U _beng _erda _epn _cP@U _dOCLCO _dEBLCP _dYDXCP _dOCLCF _dNT _dNHM _dOCLCQ _dCOH |
||
020 |
_a9780809334087 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aPN1998 _b.M534 2015 |
049 | _aMAIN | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMichael Moore and the rhetoric of documentary /edited by Thomas W. Benson and Brian J. Snee. |
260 |
_aCarbondale : _bSouthern Illinois University Press, _c(c)2015. |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource (vi, 232 pages) : _billustrations |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
504 | _a2 | ||
520 | 0 | _a"Not afraid to tackle provocative topics in American culture, from gun violence and labor policies to terrorism and health care, Michael Moore has earned both applause and invective in his career as a documentarian. In such polarizing films as Bowling for Columbine, Fahrenheit 9/11, and Sicko, Moore has established a unique voice of radical nostalgia for progressivism, and in doing so has become one of the most recognized documentary filmmakers of all time. In the first in-depth study of Moore's feature-length documentary films, editors Thomas W. Benson and Brian J. Snee have gathered leading rhetoric scholars to examine the production, rhetorical appeals, and audience reception of these films. Contributors critique the films primarily as modes of public argument and political art. Each essay is devoted to one of Moore's films and traces in detail how each film invites specific audience responses. Michael Moore and the Rhetoric of Documentary reveals not only the art, the argument, and the emotional appeals of Moore's documentaries but also how these films have revolutionized the genre of documentary filmmaking."--Provided by publisher. | |
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aMichael Moore and the rhetoric of documentary: art, argument, affect 1 / _rThomas W. Benson and Brian J. Snee -- _tLaughing through our tears: rhetorical tensions in Roger and me / _rJennifer L. Borda -- _tThe big one that got away / _rChristine Harold -- _tThe many moods of Michael Moore: aesthetics and affect in Bowling for Columbine / _rBrian L. Ott and Susan A. Sci -- _tThe conversion of Lila Lipscomb in Fahrenheit 9/11 / _rThomas Rosteck and Thomas S. Frentz -- _tThe phenomenal text of Michael Moore's Sicko / _rEdward Schiappa, Daniel Ladislau Horvath, and Peter B. Gregg -- _tThe ghosts of Michael Moore's future-Past: or, the many failures of Slacker uprising / _rDavis W. Houck and Joseph Delbert Davenport -- _t"I'm sorry to see it go": nostalgic rhetoric in Michael Moore's Capitalism: a love story / _rKendall R. Phillips. |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
600 | 1 | 0 |
_aMoore, Michael, _d1954 April 23- _xCriticism and interpretation. |
650 | 0 |
_aMotion pictures _xPolitical aspects _zUnited States. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aDocumentary films _xPolitical aspects _xHistory and criticism. |
|
655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
700 | 1 |
_aSnee, Brian J., _e5 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aBenson, Thomas W., _e5 |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1031290&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password |
942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hPN.. _m2015 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
999 |
_c84946 _d84946 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |