000 03411cam a2200421Ii 4500
001 ocn900345130
003 OCoLC
005 20240726104930.0
008 150117t19701970kyu ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aEBLCP
_beng
_epn
_erda
_cEBLCP
_dNT
_dOCLCQ
_dNT
_dOCLCE
_dOCLCF
_dKUK
_dE7B
_dJSTOR
_dBTCTA
_dYDXCP
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dP@U
020 _a9780813162140
_q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042 _adlr
043 _ae------
_an-us---
050 0 4 _aD619
_b.H578 1970
049 _aMAIN
100 1 _aBlakey, George T.,
_e1
245 1 0 _aHistorians on the homefront :
_bAmerican propagandists for the great war /
_cGeorge T. Blakey.
260 _aLexington, Kentucky :
_bThe University Press of Kentucky,
_c(c)1970.
300 _a1 online resource (168 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _adata file
_2rda
504 _a2
505 0 0 _aI: The Dilemma of War; II: Mobilizing the Historians; III: Professors and Pamphlets; IV: Using and Abusing Oratory; V: Historians as Censors; VI: In and Out of the Classroom; VII: Criticisms and Conclusions; Bibliographical Essay; Index.
520 0 _aWhen Woodrow Wilson called on the American people to mobilize for war in April 1917, it was hardly surprising that historians should respond to their one-time colleague. Mobilization produced three organizations staffed by many of America's leading historians. All three organizations, the author shows, viewed as their task the mobilizing of America's intellectual resources in support of Wilson's war policies. The postwar decade saw an inevitable cooling of wartime passions and a reevaluation of the causes of the war. George T. Blakey examines the postwar reaction to the activities of the CPI, NBHS, and NSL, which included congressional investigations and acerbic attacks in popular and scholarly periodicals. A number of the historians came to regret their wartime propaganda work; a few of these joined the ranks of the revisionists and turned on their colleagues. Others merely strengthened their Germanophobia. The majority, Mr. Blakely finds, resumed their academic careers, apparently untouched by the part they had played in mobilizing the American war effort. The question of scholarly integrity versus propaganda has never been fully resolved, the author concludes, but later generations of historians can still learn much from the example of America's World War I historians-turned-propagandists.
530 _a2
_ub
538 _aMaster and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
_uhttp://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
_5MiAaHDL
583 1 _adigitized
_c2010
_hHathiTrust Digital Library
_lcommitted to preserve
_2pda
_5MiAaHDL
650 0 _aWorld War, 1914-1918
_xPropaganda.
650 0 _aWorld War, 1914-1918
_zUnited States.
650 0 _aHistorians
_zUnited States.
655 1 _aElectronic Books.
856 4 0 _uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=938665&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942 _cOB
_D
_eEB
_hD
_m1970
_QOL
_R
_x
_8NFIC
_2LOC
994 _a92
_bNT
999 _c83290
_d83290
902 _a1
_bCynthia Snell
_c1
_dCynthia Snell