000			01872cam a2200361Ii 4500
001			on1289367499
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104847.0
008			211218s2021 xx o 000 0 eng d
040			_aEBLCP _beng _erda _cEBLCP _dIEEEE _dYDX _dOCLCO _dNT
020			_a9781468603422
020			_a9781468603439 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aTL152 _b.C758 2021
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aYoung, Richard, _e1
245	1	0	_aCritical analysis of prototype autonomous vehicle crash rates : _bsix scientific studies from 2015-2018 / _cRichard Young.
300			_a1 online resource (251 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
500			_aDescription based upon print version of record.
504			_a2
520	0		_aWill Automated Vehicles be Safer than Conventional Vehicles? One of the critically important questions that has emerged about advanced technologies in transportation is how to test the actual effects of these advanced systems on safety, particularly how to evaluate the safety of highly automated driving systems. Richard Young's Critical Analysis of Prototype Autonomous Vehicle Crash Rates does a deep dive into these questions by reviewing and then critically analyzing the first six scientific studies of AV crash rates.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aAutomated vehicles _xSafety measures.
650		0	_aTraffic accidents.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3119886&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hTL. _m2021 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c80818 _d80818
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell