000			03028cam a2200409 i 4500
001			ocn881440386
003			OCoLC
005			20240726093709.0
008			141210s2015 miu b 001 0 eng
010			_a2014048030
020			_a9780801049774
035			_a(OCoLC)881440386
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDXCP _dBTCTA _dBDX _dOCLCF _dGGB _dCDX _dTLE _dDTM _dUWT _dLNT _dWIO _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ
042			_apcc
050	0	4	_aBS2655.G259.G384 2015
050	0	4	_aBS2655
100	1		_aGathercole, Simon J, _e1
245	1	0	_aDefending substitution : _ban essay on atonement in Paul / _cSimon Gathercole. _hPR
260			_aGrand Rapids, Michigan : _bBaker Academic, _c(c)2015.
300			_a128 pages ; _c22 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aAcadia studies in Bible and theology
504			_a1 and indexes.
505	0	0	_aIntroduction ; The importance of substitution ; Defining substitution: Christ in our place ; Criticisms of substitution -- _tExegetical challenges to substitution ; The Tubingen understanding of representative "place-taking" ; Interchange in Christ ; Apocalyptic deliverance ; The omission or downplaying of "sins" -- _tConclusion -- _t"Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures" (1 Cor. 15:3) ; The importance of 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 ; "According to the Scriptures" ; Substitution in 1 Corinthians 15:3 ; Conclusion -- _tExcursus: An objection : why, then, do Christians still die? -- _tThe vicarious death of Christ and classical parallels (Rom. 5:6-8) ; The translation of Romans 5:6-8 ; A sketch of the exegesis ; Vicarious deaths in classical tradition ; The comparison in Romans 5:6-8 ; Conclusion.
520	0		_aIn recent decades, the church and academy have witnessed intense debates concerning the concept of penal substitution to describe Christ's atoning sacrifice. Some claim it promotes violence, glorifies suffering and death, and amounts to divine child abuse. Others argue it plays a pivotal role in classical Christian doctrine. Here world-renowned New Testament scholar Simon Gathercole offers an exegetical and historical defense of the traditional substitutionary view of the atonement. He provides critical analyses of various interpretations of the atonement and places New Testament teaching in its Old Testament and Greco-Roman contexts, demonstrating that the interpretation of atonement in the Pauline corpus must include substitution.
530			_a2
630	0	0	_aBible. _pEpistles of Paul _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pCorinthians, 1st, XV _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
650		0	_aAtonement _xBiblical teaching.
830		0	_aAcadia studies in Bible and theology.
907			_a.b17215742 _b04-06-16 _c04-06-16
942			_cBK _hBS _m2015 _i2018-07-15 _k0.00
945			_g1 _i31923001758065 _j2 _lcimc _o _p0.00 _q _r _s- -- _t61 _u0 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i20301649 _z04-06-16
998			_b04-06-16 _cm _da
999			_c8027 _d8027
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell