000			06278cam a2200457Ii 4500
001			on1012258433
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104816.0
008			171117s2017 gw ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aIDEBK _beng _epn _erda _cIDEBK _dEBLCP _dIDEBK _dMERUC _dYDX _dUAB _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dDTM _dOCLCQ _dDEMOS _dNT
020			_a9783161550249 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aBR121 _b.P437 2017
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aHowell, Justin R., _d1978- _e1
245	1	0	_aThe Pharisees and figured speech in Luke-Acts /Justin R. Howell.
260			_aTübingen : _bMohr Siebeck, _c(c)2017.
300			_a1 online resource (xii, 386 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aWissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament. 2. Reihe ; _v456
500			_aRevision of the author's thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago Divinity School, 2016.
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aCover; Preface; Table of Contents; Introduction; Part One: Contextualizing the Question; Chapter One: Defining Figured Speech; 1. Allusion (áơ#x94;ÎơÏ#x86;Î"Ï#x83;ιÏ#x82;); 2. Discretion (Îæáư#x90;Ï#x80;Ï#x81;ÎƯÏ#x80;ÎæιÎ"); 3. Security (áơ#x80;Ï#x83;Ï#x86;ÎƠÎ"ÎæιÎ"); 4. Freedom of Speech (Ï#x80;Î"Ï#x81;Ï#x81;ηÏ#x83;ÎĪ̂"); 5. Irony (Îæáơ°Ï#x81;Ï#x89;ÎưÎæÎĪ̂"); 6. Indirect Speech (áư#x81; Ï#x80;Î"ÎƠγιοÏ#x82; Î"Ï#x8C;γοÏ#x82;); 7. Figured Speech as an Art (Ï#x84;ÎƯÏ#x87;Îưη); Chapter Two: Methodological Approach; 1. Redactional Analysis; 2. Intertextual and Interconceptual Analysis; 3. Rhetorical and Literary Analysis; 4. Historical Analysis; 5. The History of Reception.
505	0	0	_aChapter Three: Scholarship on the Historical Pharisees1. The Authority of the Pharisees; 2. The Pharisees in the Roman Empire; Chapter Four: The Provenance of Luke-Acts; 1. Judea; 2. Ephesus; 3. Antioch in Syria; 4. The Question about Diaspora Pharisees; Chapter Five: Luke and His Readers; 1. Authorship and Date; 2. Luke and Ethnic Perspective; 3. God-Fearers in Luke-Acts; 4. The Question about Pharisaic Readers; Part Two: The Suppression of Free Speech; Chapter Six: From Figured to Free Speech; 1. Framing the Narrative of Luke-Acts; 2. The Lukan Pharisees as Spies; 3. Conclusions.
505	0	0	_aChapter Seven: Paul and Other Former Pharisees1. Paulâ#x80;#x99;s Feigned Ignorance about the High Priest (Acts 23.5); 2. Ananias as Ruler of the People; 3. Paulâ#x80;#x99;s Appeals to His Pharisaism (Acts 23.6; 26.5); 4. The Lukan Paul and His Alleged Roman Citizenship; 5. The Other Former Pharisees (Acts 15.5); 6. Conclusions; Chapter Eight: Gamaliel and the God-Fighters; 1. Complications around Gamaliel; 2. Theudas, Judas, Gamaliel, and Their Respective Followers; 3. Obedience to God versus Obedience to Gamaliel; 4. The Sanhedrin among Other God-Fighters; 5. Distinguishing Gamaliel from the Apostles.
505	0	0	_a6. Theudas, Judas, and Jesus7. Persecution for (Speech in) the Name; 8. Conclusions; Part Three: Luke's Moral Diagnosis of the Pharisees; Chapter Nine: The Initial Symptoms of Illness; 1. The Pharisees Who Remain Seated (Luke 5.17â#x80;#x93;32); 2. The Folly of the Scribes and Pharisees (Luke 6.6â#x80;#x93;11); 3. The Textual Variant at Luke 5.17c; 4. The Lukan Jesus as a Doctor of the Soul (Luke 4.23; 5.31â#x80;#x93;32); 5. Conclusions; Chapter Ten: The Passions of Injustice; 1. The Passion for Money; 2. The Passion for Glory; 3. The Passion for Luxury; 4. Passions of Injustice in Moral Philosophical Traditions.
505	0	0	_a5. The Rulers of the Pharisees and the Question of Justice6. Conclusions; Chapter Eleven: The Evil Eye and Its Cure; 1. The Pharisees and the Evil Eye of Predatory Greed; 2. Curing the Evil Eye; 3. The â#x80;#x9C;Someâ#x80;#x9D; and â#x80;#x9C;Othersâ#x80;#x9D; in the Beelzebul Controversy; 4. Conclusions; Part Four: The Pharisees and the Kingdom of God; Chapter Twelve: The Kingdom within Reach; 1. Previous Interpretations of áơ#x90;ÎưÏ#x84;áưıÏ#x82; áư#x91;Îơá¿œÎư (Luke 17.21); 2. The Kingdom â#x80;#x9C;within youâ#x80;#x9D;; 3. The Governing Part of the Soul; 4. The Kingdom â#x80;#x9C;among youâ#x80;#x9D;; 5. The Lukan Jesus as Kingly Benefactor; 6. Conclusions.
520	0		_aBack cover: Why does Luke give an ambiguous impression of the Pharisees? And what lies behind the rhetorical effects of this ambiguity? Justin R. Howell reevaluates the long-standing debate about the Pharisees in Luke-Acts, arguing the thesis that there is ambiguity in the Lukan Pharisees because, in his portrayals of them, the author has applied what ancient Greco-Roman rhetoricians call "figured speech."
520	0		_a"A scholarly consensus holds that Luke is ambivalent toward the Pharisees, or at least that he has left readers with an ambiguous depiction of them. What previous evaluations of the Lukan Pharisees have left unanswered, however, is why Luke would give such an impression of these characters and then what might lie behind the rhetorical effects of ambiguity. Justin R. Howell reevaluates the long-standing debate about the Pharisees in Luke-Acts, arguing the thesis that there is ambiguity in the Lukan Pharisees because, in his portrayals of them, the author has applied what ancient Greco-Roman rhetoricians call "figured speech." The fact that the Lukan Pharisees appear ambiguous to some readers does not necessarily mean that Luke was also undecided about or ambivalent toward them, for the use of figured speech can presuppose a firm and critical stance on the characters in view."--! From publisher's description.
530			_a2 _ub
630	0	0	_aBible. _pLuke _xLanguage, style.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pActs _xLanguage, style.
650		0	_aPharisees.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2344532&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBR. _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c79047 _d79047
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell