000			03217nam a2200421Ki 4500
001			on1079759525
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104804.0
008			181220s2018 enka ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT
020			_a9781527523593 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aBS2615 _b.P768 2018
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aGreenberg, Gary, _e1
245	1	0	_aProving Jesus' authority in Mark and John : _boverlooked evidence of a synoptic relationship / _cby Gary Greenberg.
260			_aNewcastle upon Tyne : _bCambridge Scholars Publishing, _c(c)2018.
300			_a1 online resource (vi, 234 pages) : _billustrations.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aIs John's gospel a theologically corrected re-write of Mark's gospel? -- _tJesus proves his authority -- _tJesus declines to prove his authority -- _tJesus' critics challenge the validity of his proof -- _tJesus fails to prove his authority -- _tConclusions.
520	0		_aThis innovative study of the Fourth Gospel introduces important new perspectives on synoptic problems and challenges many theories about the nature of the Gospel of John's sources and composition practices. Its analysis shows that the author of John knew a written version of Mark's gospel, had strong theological objections to how Mark depicted the nature and story of Jesus and the gospel message, and composed his gospel as a theologically corrected rewriting of Mark's, using the latter's gospel as a narrative guideline for his own composition. By focusing on several seemingly different stories in Mark and John that deal with issues relating to how Jesus proved his authority, the book places each of the incidents in their narrative, sequential, and theological context, demonstrating that John knew Mark's specific stories in the same sequential order that appeared in Mark, and that John's stories represented theologically altered rewrites of the ones in Mark. The study examines the nature of John's objections to Mark, what changes John would want to make to Mark, and the formulaic editorial techniques John used to transform Mark's gospel into John's gospel. Of particular interest, it shows how John transformed Mark's stories about proof through exorcisms into Johannine stories about proof through words.
530			_a2 _ub
630	0	0	_aBible. _pGospels _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pJohn _xRelation to Mark.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pJohn _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pMark _xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pMark _xRelation to John.
600	0	0	_aJesus Christ _xLeadership.
650		0	_aAuthority _xReligious aspects _xChristianity.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1986593&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBS. _m2018 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c78318 _d78318
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell