000			05978cam a2200541 i 4500
001			on1034594833
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104802.0
008			180504s2018 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aYDX _beng _erda _epn _cYDX _dNT _dEBLCP _dOCLCF _dUKOUP _dYDXIT _dYOU _dSTF _dOH1 _dOCLCQ _dFIE _dOCL _dERL _dOKU _dOCLCO _dBRX _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dUKAHL _dOCLCQ _dEUW _dOCLCO _dOCLCA _dQGJ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
020			_a9780191818530 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9780191076268 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aHV6049 _b.T743 2018
050	0	4	_aHV6080
049			_aMAIN
245	1	0	_aTreatment for crime : _bphilosophical essays on neurointerventions in criminal justice / _cedited by David Birks, Thomas Douglas.
250			_aFirst edition.
260			_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, _c(c)2018.
300			_a1 online resource (viii, 372 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aEngaging philosophy
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aBiological interventions for crime prevention / _rChristopher Chew, Thomas Douglas, and Nadira S. Faber -- _tCrime-preventing neurointerventions and the law : learning from anti-libidinal interventions / _rLisa Forsberg -- _tThe importance of context in thinking about crime-preventing neurointerventions / _rMatt Matravers -- _tCoercion and the neurocorrective offer / _rJonathan Pugh -- _tMoral liability to 'crime-preventing neurointervention' / _rJeff McMahan -- _tNeurointerventions, self-ownership, and enforcement rights / _rPeter Vallentyne -- _tThe self-ownership trilemma, extended minds, and neurointerventions / _rKasper Lippert-Rasmussen -- _tMoral paternalism and neurointerventions / _rEmma Bullock -- _tNeuroscientific treatment of criminals and penal theory / _rJesper Ryberg -- _tChemical castration and the violation of sexual rights / _rHallie Liberto -- _tNeural and environmental modulation of motivation : what's the moral difference? / _rThomas Douglas -- _tContaining violence and controlling desire / _rJohn McMillan -- _tNeurointerventions, morality, and children / _rMatthew Clayton and Andres Moles -- _tIntrusive intervention and opacity respect / _rChristopher Bennett -- _tThose who forget the past : an ethical challenge from the history of treating deviance / _rEmily McTernan -- _t'The soul is the prison of the body' : mandatory moral enhancement, punishment, and rights against neurorehabilitation / _rJan Christoph Bublitz -- _tAgainst the mandatory use of neurointerventions in criminal sentencing / _rElizabeth Shaw -- _tShould coercive neurointerventions target the victims of wrongdoing? / _rZofia Stemplowska -- _tCan neurointerventions communicate censure? (and so what if they can't?) / _rDavid Birks.
520	0		_aTraditional means of crime prevention, such as incarceration and psychological rehabilitation, are frequently ineffective. This collection considers how crime preventing neurointerventions (CPNs) could present a more humane alternative but, on the other hand, how neuroscientific developments and interventions may threaten fundamental human values.
520	8		_aPreventing recidivism is one of the aims of criminal justice, yet existing means of pursuing this aim are often poorly effective, highly restrictive of basic freedoms, and significantly harmful. Incarceration, for example, tends to be disruptive of personal relationships and careers, detrimental to physical and mental health, restrictive of freedom of movement, and rarely more than modestly effective at preventing recidivism. Crime-preventing neurointerventions(CPNs) are increasingly being advocated, and there is a growing use of testosterone-lowering agents to prevent recidivism in sexual offenders, and strong political and scientific interest in developing pharmaceutical treatments for psychopathy and anti-social behaviour. Future neuroscientific advancescould yield further CPNs; we could ultimately have at our disposal a range of drugs capable of suppressing violent aggression and it is not difficult to imagine possible applications of such drugs in crime prevention. Neurointerventions hold out the promise of preventing recidivism in ways that are both more effective, and more humane. But should neurointerventions be used in crime prevention? And may the state ever permissibly impose CPNs as part of the criminal justice process, either unconditionally, or as a condition of parole or early release? The use of CPNs raises several ethical concerns, as they could be highly intrusive and may threaten fundamental human values, such as bodily integrityand freedom of thought. In the first book-length treatment of this topic, Treatment for Crime, brings together original contributions from internationally renowned moral and political philosophers to address these questions and consider the possible issues, recognizing how humanity has a track record ofmisguided, harmful and unwarrantedly coercive use of neurotechnological 'solutions' to criminality.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aRecidivism _xPrevention.
650		0	_aCrime prevention.
650		0	_aMental illness _xTreatment.
650		0	_aLaw _xPsychological aspects.
650		0	_aCriminal psychology.
650		0	_aCentral nervous system.
650		0	_aBrain _xPhysiology.
650		0	_aMental health.
650	1	2	_aRecidivism _xprevention & control
650	1	2	_aCrime _xprevention & control
650	1	2	_aMental Health
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aBirks, David, _d1981- _e5
700	1		_aDouglas, Thomas, _d1979- _e5
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1918186&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hHV _m2018 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c78217 _d78217
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell