| 000 | 01887cam a2200421Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | on1021244321 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20240726104757.0 | ||
| 008 | 180202s2018 enk ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aNT _beng _erda _epn _cNT _dEBLCP _dNT |
||
| 020 |
_a9781108195836 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic) |
||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 050 | 0 | 4 |
_aKF4945 _b.F355 2018 |
| 049 | _aMAIN | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aMaxeiner, James, _e1 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aFailures of American methods of lawmaking in historical and comparative perspectives /James R. Maxeiner ; with a foreword by Philip K. Howard. |
| 260 |
_aCambridge [UK] ; _aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _c(c)2017. |
||
| 300 | _a1 online resource. | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 347 |
_adata file _2rda |
||
| 504 | _a2 | ||
| 505 | 0 | 0 |
_aWhat Americans sought -- _tWhat Americans got : deranged laws -- _tWhat Americans can do : improve legal methods. |
| 520 | 0 | _aChallenges the myths of common law's superiority over statute law using newly available historical sources and a comparative law analysis. | |
| 530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
| 650 | 0 |
_aLegislation _zUnited States _xHistory and criticism. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aParliamentary practice _zUnited States _xHistory and criticism. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aLaw _zUnited States _xHistory. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aParliamentary practice _zGermany. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aLegislation _vComparative studies. |
|
| 655 | 1 | _aElectronic Books. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aHoward, Philip K., _ewriter of foreword. |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1694317&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 |
| 942 |
_cOB _D _eEB _hKF _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC |
||
| 994 |
_a92 _bNT |
||
| 999 |
_c77904 _d77904 |
||
| 902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |
||