000			04039cam a2200409Mi 4500
001			on1003312024
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104752.0
008			170913s2017 deu ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aYDX _beng _epn _erda _cYDX _dEBLCP _dYDX _dIDB _dCHVBK _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCF _dCOCUF _dSTF _dMERUC _dLOA _dZCU _dVT2 _dICG _dOCLCQ _dTKN _dDKC _dOCLCQ _dNT _dOCLCQ
020			_a9781622733033 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
050	0	4	_aBJ1461 _b.F744 2017
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aDodson, Geran F., _e1
245	1	0	_aFree will, neuroethics, psychology and theology /by Geran F. Dodson.
246	1	4	_aFree will : _bneuroethics, psychology and theology
260			_aWilmington, Delaware, United States : _bVernon Press, _c(c)2017.
300			_a1 online resource
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	0		_aVernon series in philosophy
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aIntroduction; Chapter 1 Philosophy and Free Will; Determinism; Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, and Libertarianism; Indeterminism; The Philosophy of Science; The Illusion of Free Will; Implications; Chapter 2 Theology and Free Will; The Message of the Old Testament; A History of Sin; Jesus and Free Will; Paul the Apostle; Roman Catholics and Protestants; An Evaluation; Chapter 3 Science and Free Will; The Dawn of Neuroscience; Genetics and Free Will; Opposition to Scientific Claims; The Challenge; Chapter 4 Psychology and Free Will; Free Will and Folklore; Evolutionary Psychology.
505	0	0	_aSocial PsychologyFinal Thoughts; Chapter 5 Ethics and Neuroscience; Teleology (Consequentialism); Deontology (Non-consequentialism); Virtue Ethics; Neuroethics; Ethics and Moral Responsibility; A Reflection; Chapter 6 Toward A New Theology; Ethics and Theology; Original Sin; Arguments for the Existence of God; Perception and Belief; Chapter 7 A New Theology; Chapter 8 The Future of Free Will; Philosophy; Evolutionary Psychology; Theology; Evolutionary Psychology of Religion; Science; Conclusion; Bibliography; Index.
520	8		_aAnnotation _bThe topic of human free will has received more attention in the past several years due to the important discoveries of neuroscience but no consensus of opinion is evident in related disciplines. The traditional approach to understanding free will in philosophy employs conceptual analysis to determine whether humans have freedom of choice. Theology affirms that every person has free choice although God is somehow behind all human decisions. Evolutionary psychology points to human behavior as the product of biological processes and antecedent events. And neuroethics attempts to define what it means to be a thinking moral agent by investigating how neurons in the brain and chemical interactions combine to produce conscious actions. An assessment and evaluation of these various positions is given in light of the evidence. The issue of whether a person can be held morally responsible for their actions hinges on whether those actions originate from free will or are the result of determinism. Theology makes assumptions of the existence of an absolute deity that has a hand in human decision making, but there is no agreement regarding the nature of that intervention. Recent scientific discoveries confront traditionally held religious beliefs and necessitate the creation of a new theology and articles of faith.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aFree will and determinism.
650		0	_aFree will and determinism _xReligious aspects.
650		0	_aFree will and determinism _xPsychological aspects.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1591693&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBJ _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c77697 _d77697
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell