000			05349cam a2200481 i 4500
001			ocn957265055
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104743.0
008			160823t20172017nyua ob 001 0 eng
010			_a2016039211
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _epn _cDLC _dOCLCO _dNT _dEBLCP _dYDX _dOCLCF _dIDB _dUAB _dOCLCQ _dBLOOM _dOCLCQ _dINT _dOCLCQ _dWYU _dOCLCQ _dLUN _dYDX
020			_a9781474279819 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9781474279857 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
020			_a9781474279840 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_apcc
050	1	4	_aBJ1459 _b.P335 2017
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aHolmes, Robert L., _e1
245	1	0	_aPacifism : _ba philosophy of nonviolence / _cRobert L. Holmes.
260			_aLondon ; _aNew York : _bBloomsbury Academic, _c(c)2017.
300			_a1 online resource (xviii, 346 pages) : _billustrations
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aCover; Half Title; Series; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Part 1; 1 Reconceptualizing War; 1.1 Absolute war; 1.2 The interests of the people, the interests of the state and the interests of the people who rule the state; 1.3 Absolute violence; 1.4 Between war and peace; 1.5 Cyberwar and robotics; 1.6 Toward an ontology of war; 1.7 Paradoxes of war; 1.8 War, warfare and warmaking; 1.9 Synoptic war; 1.10 Conclusion; 2 The Presumption against War; 2.1 The ends of morality and warfare; 2.2 War and killing; 2.3 Act types and act tokens.
505	0	0	_a2.4 The presumptive wrongness of deliberately killing persons2.5 Is some wrongdoing inescapable?; 2.6 Intrinsic and extrinsic wrongness; 2.7 The presumptive wrongness of warfare; 2.8 Possible objections; 2.9 The presumptive wrongness of whole war; 2.10 The burden of proof; 2.11 Conclusion; 3 Realism and War; 3.1 Hard and soft realism; 3.2 Descriptive, necessitarian and normative realism; 3.3 Can it be immoral to act morally?; 3.4 War and morality; 3.5 Value language and deontic language; 3.6 Synoptic war neither right nor wrong; 3.7 Warfare always subject to moral assessment.
505	0	0	_a3.8 Micro- and macroethics3.9 Collective ethics a category mistake; 3.10 Conclusion; Part 2; 4 Augustine on Ethics and War; 4.1 Augustine and the just war tradition; 4.2 Was Augustine a private pacifist?; 4.3 Augustine's subjectivism; 4.4 Motives and right conduct; 4.5 Private pacifism and clean hands; 4.6 Augustine's authoritarianism; 4.7 Killing out of obedience; 4.8 Conclusion; 5 Anatomy of the Just War Theory; 5.1 Just war tradition and just war theory; 5.2 Moral war theory; 5.3 Just war internalism and externalism; 5.4 What does jus ad bellum entitle one to do?
505	0	0	_a5.5 Intention, double effect and deliberate wartime killing5.6 Right intention and the resort to war; 5.7 Right intention and individual combatants; 5.8 Just war theory's further implications; 5.9 License to kill; 5.10 Conclusion; 6 Self-Defense and the Alleged Moral Equality of Soldiers; 6.1 War and self-defense; 6.2 A Walzerian argument for the "moral equality" of soldiers; 6.3 Personal self-defense; 6.4 Self-.defense as a moral concept; 6.5 Self-.defense and the presumptive wrongness of killing; 6.6 Personal and collective self-defense; 6.7 Defending a common life.
505	0	0	_a6.8 Self-.defense and liability6.9 Self-defense and just cause; 6.10 Potential soldiers and their "epistemic duties"; 6.11 Conclusion; 7 Just Cause and the Killing of Innocents; 7.1 Killing innocents inherent in warfare; 7.2 Killing and letting die; 7.3 Intentional and foreseeable killing; 7.4 The Counterfactual Test; 7.5 A differential restriction; 7.6 Incidental harms; 7.7 Hypothetical cases; 7.8 Does a just cause entitle one to kill innocents?; 7.9 The Nazi and the just warrior; 7.10 Infringement and disrespectful violation of rights; 7.11 Do good motives suffice?; 7.12 Conclusion; Part 3.
520	8		_aIn a world riven with conflict, violence and war, this book proposes a philosophical defense of pacifism. It argues that there is a moral presumption against war and unless that presumption is defeated, war is unjustified. Leading philosopher of nonviolence Robert Holmes contends that neither just war theory nor the rationales for recent wars (Vietnam, the Gulf War, the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars) defeat that presumption, hence that war in the modern world is morally unjustified. A detailed, comprehensive and elegantly argued text which guides both students and scholars through the main debates (Just War Theory and double effect to name a few) clearly but without oversimplifying the complexities of the issues or historical examples.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aPacifism.
650		0	_aNonviolence _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aWar _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aJust war doctrine.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1361374&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hBJ. _m2017 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c77155 _d77155
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell