000			03102cam a2200397Ii 4500
001			ocn171301340
003			OCoLC
005			20240726104709.0
008			070914s2001 cou obm 001 0 eng d
040			_aNT _beng _epn _erda _cNT _dYDXCP _dOCLCQ _dOSU _dVLB _dOCLCE _dDOS _dOCLCQ _dACLSE _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dNT _dOCLCQ _dUKBRU _dCOO _dIDEBK _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dYDX _dOCLCF _dFIE _dUAB _dTXC _dSTF _dDKC _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
020			_a9780786742905 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)
042			_adlr
050	0	4	_aPN81 _b.C758 2001
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aKolbas, E. Dean. _e1
245	1	0	_aCritical theory and the literary canon /E. Dean Kolbas.
260			_aBoulder, Colo. : _bWestview Press, _c(c)2001.
300			_a1 online resource (vii, 182 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
520	0		_aKolbas stakes out new territory in assessing the war over literary canon formation, a subject that contemporary polemicists have devoted much ink to. Throughout this succinct manuscript, Kolbas ranges through the sociology and politics of culture, aesthetic theory, and literary theory to develop his point that texts not only must should be situated in the historical and material conditions of their production, but also evaluated for their very real aesthetic content. One reason the is an important issue, Kolbas contends, is that the canon is not simply enclosed in the ivory tower of academia; its effects are apparent in a much wider field of cultural production and use. He begins by critiquing the conservative humanist and liberal pluralist positions on the canon, which either assiduously avoid any sociological explanation of the canon or treat texts as stand-ins for particular ideologies. Kolbas is sympathetic to the arguments of Bourdieu et. al. regarding positioning the canon in a wider "field of cultural production" than the university, but argues that theirs are purely sociological explanations of aesthetics (id est, there is no objective aesthetic content) that ignore art's autonomous realm, which he argues --
530			_a2 _ub
538			_aMaster and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. _uhttp://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212 _5MiAaHDL
583	1		_adigitized _c2010 _hHathiTrust Digital Library _lcommitted to preserve _2pda _5MiAaHDL
650		0	_aCriticism _xHistory _y20th century.
650		0	_aCanon (Literature)
650		0	_aLiterature, Modern _xHistory and criticism _xTheory, etc.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password. _uhttpss://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=538835&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hPN _m2001 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c75226 _d75226
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell