000 | 02919pam a2200409 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocm23015503 | ||
005 | 20240726103805.0 | ||
008 | 910103s1991 inu b s001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a91004373 | ||
039 | 0 | 2 | _aCI ocm23015503 |
039 | 0 | 4 | _aER 12541 |
039 | 0 | 1 | _aBE stmpAAD-6310 |
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dSBI |
||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
049 | 0 | 2 | _aSBIM |
049 | 0 | 4 | _aso4 |
049 | 0 | 1 | _aBDCC |
050 | 0 | 4 |
_aBX8236 _b.E275 1991 |
050 | 0 | 4 | _aBX8236 |
100 | 1 |
_aRichey, Russell E, _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aEarly American Methodism /Russell E. Richey. |
260 |
_aBloomington : _bIndiana University Press, _c(c)1991. |
||
300 |
_axix, 137 pages ; _c25 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _a1 (pages 101-130) and index. | ||
520 | 0 | _aOffering a revisionist reading of American Methodism, this book goes beyond the limits of institutional history by suggesting a new and different approach to the examination of denominations. Russell E. Richey identifies within Methodism four distinct "languages" and explores the self-understanding that each language offers the early Methodists. One of these, a pietistic or evangelical vernacular, commonly employed in sermons, letters, and journals, is Richey's focus and provides a way for him to reconsider critical interpretive issues in American religious historiography and the study of Methodism. Richey challenges some important historical conventions, for instance, that the crucial changes in American Methodism occurred in 1784 when ties with John Wesley and Britain were severed, arguing instead for important continuities between the first and subsequent decades of Methodist experience. | |
520 | 0 | _aAs Richey shows, the pietistic vernacular did not displace other Methodist languages Wesleyan, Anglican, or the language of American political discourse nor can it supplant them as interpretive devices. Instead, attention to the vernacular severs to highlight the tensions among the other Methodist languages and to suggest something of the complexity of early Methodist discourse. It reveals the incomplete connections made among the several languages, the resulting imprecisions and confusions that derived from using idioms from different languages, and the ways the Methodists drew upon the distinct languages during times of stress, change, and conflict. | |
530 | _a2 | ||
650 | 0 |
_aMethodist Church _zUnited States _xHistory _y18th century. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aMethodist Church _zUnited States _xHistory _y19th century. |
|
907 |
_a.b10766303 _b09-19-14 _c01-22-08 |
||
942 |
_cBK _hBX _m1991 _e _i2018-07-14 _k0.00 |
||
998 |
_abcm _acim _aecc _b05-26-09 _cm _da _e- _feng _ginu _h0 |
||
945 |
_g1 _i31923000790481 _j2 _lcimc _n"repair" status after fire _o- _p0.00 _q- _r- _s- -- _t61 _u0 _v0 _w0 _x0 _y.i11108514 _z01-22-08 |
||
999 |
_c44645 _d44645 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |