000 | 03814cam a22004094i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocm59881948 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726100234.0 | ||
008 | 050422s2006 miu b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2005046225 | ||
035 | _aocm59881948 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDX _dBAKER _dSVW _dIBI _dQBX _dXY4 _dSBI |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
049 | 0 | 2 | _aSBIM |
049 | 0 | 6 | _aSGE |
050 | 0 | 4 | _aKF4772.B662.F744 2006 |
050 | 0 | 4 | _aKF4772 |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aFree speech / _cJohn Boaz, book editor. _hPR |
260 |
_aFarmington Hills, Michigan : _bGreenhaven Press, _c(c)2006. |
||
300 |
_a221 pages ; _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
440 | 0 |
_aCurrent controversies _937397 |
|
504 | _a1 (pages 211-213) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aYes: Free speech should be limited. Flag burning should not be protected speech _rCitizens Flag Alliance -- _tHate speech should be limited _rLaura Leets -- _tColleges may restrict some types of speech _rDerek P. Langhauser -- _tPornography should be censored _rS. Michael Craven -- _tNo: Free speech should not be limited. Flag burning is a legitimate expression of dissent _rRalph G. Neas, Marge Baker -- _tSpeech codes threaten the free exchange of ideas on college campuses _rEugene Volokh -- _tLimiting hate speech threatens legitimate debate _rIra H. Mehlman -- _tGovernment should not define obscenity for its citizens _rJeffrey Rosen -- _tGovernment should not censor art _rAmerican Civil Liberties Union -- _tYes: Free speech is threatened. Media consolidation threatens free speech _rRobert W. McChesney -- _tLibrary Internet filters block access to vital information _rKaiser Family Foundation -- _tCampaign finance reform limits political expression _rJohn Samples -- _tFreedom of the press is threatened _rCharles Lewis -- _tNo: Free speech is not threatened. Campaign finance reform could enhance political expression _rJohn Kerry -- _tFilters and ratings systems are protecting free speech _rJeffrey Cole -- _tMedia consolidation does not threaten free speech _rAdam Thierer -- _tYes: War on terror threatens free speech. Free speech is often restricted during wartime _rDavid Hudson -- _tCriticisms of the war on terror are being suppressed _rAlisa Solomon -- _tAnti-terrorism policies threaten First Amendment protections _rElizabeth Dahl, Joseph Onek -- _tPartriot Act discourages the free exchange of ideas _rEleanor J. Bader -- _tNo: War on terror does not threaten free speech. Right to dissent has not been threatened in the war on terrorism _rBobby Eberle -- _tPatriot Act does not threaten free speech _rJohn Ashcroft -- _tEmbedded reporters during the Iraq war improved war coverage _rJeffrey C. Bliss -- _tHow should the right to free speech apply to corporations? Corporations should be granted the same free |
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aspeech rights as individuals _rKathy Cripps -- _tCorporations do not have the right to free speech _rCarl J. Mayer, Brenda Wright -- _tBroadcast media conglomerates promote free speech _rAnthony J. Dukes -- _tConsolidation of media outlets raises concerns about limits on free speech _rGal Beckerman -- _tTelemarketers should be able to contact potential customers _rSolveig Singleton -- _tTelemarketing is not protected free speech _rBill Lockyear and others -- _tCorporations threaten freedom of speech _rLawrence Soley. |
530 | _a2 | ||
650 | 0 |
_aFreedom of speech _zUnited States. |
|
700 | 1 | _aBoaz, John. | |
907 |
_a.b11140483 _b09-13-11 _c01-22-08 |
||
942 |
_cBK _hKFZ _m2006 _e _i2018-07-14 _k0.00 |
||
998 |
_acim _aswg _b05-27-09 _cm _da _e- _feng _gmiu _h0 |
||
994 |
_a01 _bSBI |
||
945 |
_g1 _i31923001109806 _j2 _lcimc _n"repair" status after fire _o- _p0.00 _q- _r- _s- -- _t61 _u2 _v0 _w2 _x0 _y.i11704561 _z01-22-08 |
||
999 |
_c13162 _d13162 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |