000 | 03388cam a2200457 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn436625375 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240726110913.0 | ||
008 | 091110s2010 ilu b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2009047371 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDX _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dDTM _dSGB _dCDX _dQBX _dBDX _dLMR _dP4I _dOCLCF _dRCT _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dNLUKB _dOCLCQ _dPRP _dOCLCO _dKAT _dSBI |
||
020 | _a9781433501432 | ||
020 | _a9781433518133 | ||
029 | 1 |
_aAU@ _b000044968152 |
|
029 | 1 |
_aCDX _b10856510 |
|
029 | 1 |
_aNZ1 _b13409783 |
|
035 | _a(OCoLC)436625375 | ||
049 | _aSBIM | ||
050 | 0 | 4 | _aBT1317.K94.H474 2010 |
100 | 1 |
_aKostenberger, Andreas J., _d1957-, _e1 |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe heresy of orthodoxy : _bhow contemporary culture's fascination with diversity has reshaped our understanding of early Christianity / _cAndreas J. Kostenberger and Michael J. Kruger ; foreword by I. Howard Marshall. _hPR |
260 |
_aWheaton, Illinois : _bCrossway, _c(c)2010. |
||
300 |
_a250 pages ; _c22 cm. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _a1 and indexes. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_aForeword/ _rby I. Howard Marshall -- _tIntroduction: The contemporary battle to recast the origins of the New Testament and early Christianity -- _tThe Bauer-Ehrman thesis : its origins and influence -- _tUnity and plurality : how early was early Christianity? -- _tHeresy in the New Testament : how early was it? -- _tStarting in the right place : the meaning of canon in early Christianity -- _tInterpreting the historical evidence : the emerging canon in early Christianity -- _tEstablishing the boundaries : apocryphal books and the limits of the canon -- _tKeepers of the text : how were texts copied and circulated in the ancient world? -- _tTampering with the text : was the New Testament text changed along the way? -- _tConcluding appeal: The heresy of orthodoxy in a topsy-turvy world. |
520 | 0 | _aBeginning with Walter Bauer in 1934, the denial of clear orthodoxy in early Christianity has shaped and largely defined modern New Testament criticism, recently given new life through the work of spokesmen like Bart Ehrman. Spreading from academia into mainstream media, the suggestion that diversity of doctrine in the early church led to many competing orthodoxies is indicative of today's postmodern relativism. Kostenberger and Kruger's accessible and careful scholarship not only counters the "Bauer Thesis" using its own terms, but also engages overlooked evidence from the New Testament. Their conclusions are drawn from analysis of the evidence of unity in the New Testament, the formation and closing of the canon, and the methodology and integrity of the recording and distribution of religious texts within the early church. --from publisher description. | |
530 |
_a2 _ub |
||
630 | 0 | 0 |
_aBible. _pNew Testament _xCriticism, interpretation, etc. |
600 | 1 | 0 |
_aBauer, Walter, _d1877-1960. |
600 | 1 | 0 | _aEhrman, Bart D. |
650 | 0 |
_aTheology, Doctrinal _xHistory _yEarly church, ca. 30-600. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aChristian heresies _xHistory _yEarly church, ca. 30-600. |
|
650 | 0 |
_aChurch history _yPrimitive and early church, ca. 30-600. |
|
650 | 0 | _aPostmodern theology. | |
700 | 1 | _aKruger, Michael J. | |
942 |
_DCharles Still _m(c)2010. _cBK _hBT1317 _i2021-12-14 |
||
994 |
_aC0 _bSBI |
||
999 |
_c102961 _d102961 |
||
902 |
_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell |