000			04137cam a2200493Ii 4500
001			on1048613885
003			OCoLC
005			20240726110906.0
008			180816s2018 mau g b 001 0 eng d
029	1		_aCHBIS _b011270656
029	1		_aCHVBK _b526025557
035			_a(OCoLC)1048613885
040			_aUIN _beng _erda _cUIN _dJDR _dIBI _dIDA _dBDX _dWKM _dOCLCF _dJYJ _dOCLCQ _dCHK _dUOO
043			_an-us---
049			_aSBI
050	0	4	_aBF723.S678.M673 2018
050	0	4	_aBF723
245	0	0	_aMoral reasoning about human welfare in adolescents and adults : _bjudging conflicts involving sacrificing and saving lives / _cAudun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel ; with commentary by Melanie Killen and Kelly Lynn Mulvey ; Patricia J. Bauer, series editor. _hPR
260			_aBoston, Mass. : _bWiley, _c(c)2018.
300			_a132 pages ; _c23 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, _x0037-976X ; _vserial no. 330, vol. 83, no. 3, 2018
505	0	0	_aIntroduction/ _rAudun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel -- _tInvestigating both evaluations and reasoning about systematically varied trolley car situations/ _rAudun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, and Elliot Turiel -- _tVarying the involvement of the potential victims/ _rAudun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel -- _tGeneral discussion/ _rAudun Dahl, Matthew Gingo, Kevin Uttich, Elliot Turiel -- _tCommentary: Challenging a dual-process approach to moral reasoning : adolescents and adults evaluations of trolley car situations/ _rMelanie Killen and Kelly Lynn Mulvey.
520	0		_aThe value of human life is a significant moral value for most people. Yet, past research has devoted little attention to the development of moral reasoning about the value of life. The present studies investigated how adolescents and adults reason about the value of life in the context of so-called trolley car situations. These situations, adopted from philosophy, involve the option of sacrificing the life of one person to save five others. Based on past developmental research, we expected that individuals would reason about distinct and sometimes conflicting considerations regarding the value of life. This approach contrasted with past research on adults' responses to trolley car situations, which has been taken to show that most moral evaluations are based not on reasoning but on affective, automatic reactions. In Study 1, 288 adolescents and adults were interviewed about trolley car situations designed to examine considerations like the value of human life and the relationship of those at risk with the actors. In Study 2, 144 college students were interviewed to further examine the roles of those involved. Participants' justifications referred not only to the number of lives saved, but also to other considerations, such as intrinsic rights and personal responsibility for events. Moreover, responses indicated frequent conflicts about standard trolley car situations, counter to the argument that people's evaluations are automatic or based solely on a counting of lives saved. The present findings indicate that adolescents and adults reason about, and seek to coordinate, distinct moral considerations regarding the value of life.
530			_a2
650		0	_aChild development _zUnited States.
650		0	_aReasoning _xMoral and ethical aspects.
700	1		_aSociety for Research in Child Development.
700	1		_aDahl, Audun,
700	1		_aGingo, Matthew,
700	1		_aUttich, Kevin,
700	1		_aTuriel, Elliot,
700	1		_aKillen, Melanie,
700	1		_aMulvey, Kelly Lynn,
700	1		_ecommentator.
700	1		_ecommentator.
830		0	_aMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development ; _vv. 83, no. 3.
856	4	1	_3Online version _uhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mono.v83.3/issuetoc
942			_2lcc _cBK _hBF _m2018 _w36.16
948			_hNO HOLDINGS IN SBI - 57 OTHER HOLDINGS
999			_c102622 _d102622
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell