000			04965cam a2200385Mi 4500
001			ocn776812458
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105458.0
008			110221t20112011onc ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aCELBN _beng _erda _cCELBN _dYDXCP _dE7B _dOCLCQ _dJSTOR _dNT
020			_a9781442694521 _q((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)l((electronic)l(electronic)ctronic)ctronic bk.
029	1		_aAU@ _b000048852553
050	0	4	_aH62 _b.S438 2011
049			_aNTA
100	1		_aVan den Hoonaard, Will. C. _q(Willy Carl), _d1942- _e1
245	1	0	_aThe seduction of ethics _btransforming the social sciences / _cWill C. van den Hoonaard.
260			_aToronto [Ont. : _bUniversity of Toronto Press, _c(c)2011.
260			_a(Saint-Lazare, Quebec : _bCanadian Electronic Library, _c(c)2012).
300			_a1 online resource (xv, 375 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aIntroduction ; Premise of The Seduction of Ethics ; Ignorance and Scholarship ; The Scholarship on the Metabolism of Research-Ethics Review ; Conceptual Scheme ; Research Methods ; Outline of The Seduction of Ethics -- _tAn archeology of Research-Ethics Review ; Outside the Ethics Regime: What Drives the System of Ethics Review? ; Inside the System: Institutionalization of Research-Ethics Review -- _tThe Criticisms of Research-Ethics Review ; Does the Ethics Regime Offer an Inappropriate Model for Social Science Research? ; Is Research Ethics Strangling Legitimate Research? ; Does Ethics Review Curtail Academic Freedom? ; Are Ethics Committees Bureaucracies? ; Does Ethics Review Develop and Maintain the Hegemony of Ethics Committees? ; Attempts to Negotiate the Two Worlds and Transcend the Criticisms: The Perspectives of Ethics Committees -- _tWhat is the Normative Ethics Framework for Social Researchers? ; The 'Subject' in International and National Research-Ethics Codes ; Bursting the Contemporary Ethics Bubble: Three Case Studies -- _tStructure and Composition of Research-Ethics Committees ; Ethics Committees as Part of the University ; Membership ; Jurisdictional Power and Independence ; Workload -- _tThe Moral Cosmology of the Ethics-Review World ; About Themselves ; About Researchers ; About Research Participants -- _tProcedural Routines: The Application form and the Consent Form ; The Application Form ; The Consent Form -- _tThe Meeting: Making Agendas and Decisions ; Attendance and Membership ; The Career of the Agenda ; Paradigms and Perspectives that Shape the Conversation about Ethics ; Making Decisions without Principles An Idiosyncratic and Inconsistent World: Communications Between Rebs and Researchers ; Interpretation as the Basis of Idiosyncrasies and Inconsistencies ; Communications to Researchers/Language of (Dis)approval ; Content ; Language ; REB Communications inside the Larger Context of the Ethics Regime -- _tThe Underlife of Research-Ethics Review: Preparing an Application ; The 'Hurt Perspective' ; The Researcher's Moral Career ; Warming up (or Not) to Submitting the Proposal ; Preparing for the 'News' -- _tSecondary Adjustments by Researchers ; Reactions by Researchers to Ethics Reviews ; Applying Secondary Adjustments ; The Social Situation of Students in the Ethics-Review Process -- _tThe Beleaguered Methods ; General Considerations about Redirecting Research ; The Declining Use of Particular Methods -- _tOn Theory, Topics, and Favoured Methods.
520	0		_aFormal research-ethics committees in Canada now function as an industry, costing over thirty-five million dollars annually. The Seduction of Ethics argues that while ethics codes are alluring to the public, they fuel moral panic and increase demands for institutional accountability. Will C. van den Hoonaard explores the research-ethics review process itself by analysing the moral cosmology and practices of ethics committees regarding research and researchers. The Seduction of Ethics also investigates how researchers have tailored their approaches in response to technical demands - leading social science disciplines to resemble each other more closely and lose the richness of their research. Van den Hoonaard reveals an idiosyncratic and inconsistent world in which researchers employ particular strategies of avoidance or partial or full compliance as they seek approval from ethics committees.
530			_a2 _ub
650		0	_aSocial sciences _xResearch _xMoral and ethical aspects.
650		0	_aSocial sciences and ethics.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=682808&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hH _mc2011 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a02 _bNT
999			_c101628 _d101628
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell