000			03781cam a2200457Mi 4500
001			ocn868980417
003			OCoLC
005			20240726105429.0
008			051001t20062006nju ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aE7B _beng _erda _epn _cE7B _dOCLCO _dCOO _dNLGGC _dNT _dJSTOR _dP@U _dYDXCP _dDEBSZ _dOCLCQ _dCOCUF _dAGLDB _dMOR _dPIFAG _dSTF _dOCLCQ _dIOG _dOCLCO _dU3W _dEZ9 _dOCLCF _dVNS _dVTS _dVT2 _dAU@ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dLVT _dTKN _dOCLCA _dM8D _dOCLCA _dMM9 _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
020			_a9780691134062
043			_an-us---
050	0	4	_aJK1161 _b.F555 2006
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aWawro, Gregory J. _q(Gregory John) _e1
245	1	0	_aFilibuster : _bobstruction and lawmaking in the U.S. Senate / _cGregory J. Wawro and Eric Schickler.
246	3	0	_aObstruction and lawmaking in the U.S. Senate
260			_aPrinceton, New Jersey : _bPrinceton University Press, _c(c)2006.
300			_a1 online resource (326 pages).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_adata file _2rda
490	1		_aPrinceton studies in American politics : historical, international, and comparative perspectives
504			_a2
505	0	0	_aObstruction in theoretical context -- _tThe mutability of senate rules -- _tWhere's the pivot? -- _tDilatory motions and the success of obstruction -- _tObstruction and the tariff -- _tSlavery and obstruction in the antebellum senate -- _tObstruction and institutional change -- _tCloture reform reconsidered -- _tThe impact of cloture on the appropriations process.
520	0		_aParliamentary obstruction, popularly known as the 'filibuster, ' has been a defining feature of the U.S. Senate throughout its history. In this book, Wawro and Schickler explain how the Senate managed to satisfy its lawmaking role during the 19th and early 20th century, when it lacked seemingly essential formal rules for governing debate. What prevented the Senate from self-destructing during this time? The authors argue that in a system where filibusters played out as wars of attrition, the threat of rule changes prevented the institution from devolving into parliamentary chaos. They show that institutional patterns of behavior induced by inherited rules did not render Senate rules immune from fundamental changes. The authors' theoretical arguments are supported through a combination of extensive quantitative and case-study analysis, which spans a broad swath of history. They consider how changes in the larger institutional and political context--such as the expansion of the country and the move to direct election of senators--led to changes in the Senate regarding debate rules. They further investigate the impact these changes had on the functioning of the Senate. The book concludes with a discussion relating battles over obstruction in the Senate's past to recent conflicts over judicial nominations.--Book jacket flap.
530			_a2 _ub
610	1	0	_aUnited States. _bCongress. _bSenate _xFreedom of debate.
610	1	0	_aUnited States. _bCongress. _bSenate _xCloture.
610	1	0	_aUnited States. _bCongress. _bSenate _vRules and practice.
610	1	6	_aÉtats-Unis. _bCongress. _bSenate _vRèglements et procédure.
610	1	6	_aÉtats-Unis. _bCongress. _bSenate _xLiberté de parole.
650		0	_aFilibusters (Political science) _zUnited States.
655		1	_aElectronic Books.
700	1		_aSchickler, Eric, _d1969-
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=644659&site=eds-live&custid=s3260518 _zClick to access digital title | log in using your CIU ID number and my.ciu.edu password
942			_cOB _D _eEB _hJK _m2006 _QOL _R _x _8NFIC _2LOC
994			_a92 _bNT
999			_c100060 _d100060
902			_a1 _bCynthia Snell _c1 _dCynthia Snell