Constitutional predicament :  Canada after the referendum of 1992 / 
edited by Curtis Cook. 
 - Montreal ;  Buffalo :  McGill-Queen's University Press,  (c)1994. 
 - 1 online resource (viii, 295 pages) 
<br/><br/> "Papers in this collection were delivered at a Colloquium on the Canadian Constitutional Crisis and the 26 October Referendum ... held on 13-14 November 1992 in Colorado Springs."--Page ix  Includes final text of the Consensus report on the Constitution (pages 226-249). 
<br/><br/>Includes bibliographies and index. 
<br/><br/>Introduction : Canada's predicament /  The Charlottetown Accord : multinational Canada volume federalism /  Deliberating a constitution : the meaning of the Canadian referendum of 1992 /  Looking eastward, looking backward : a western reading of the never-ending story /  Constitution making and the myth of the people /  Judicial politics Canadian-style : the Supreme Court's contribution to the constitutional crisis of 1992 /  Diversity's gambit declined /  Globalism and localism : constitutionalism in a new world order /  Appendix : Consensus report on the Constitution, Charlottetown, August 28, 1992 (Charlottetown Accord).  Curtis Cook --  Alan C. Cairns --  Alain Noël --  Barry Cooper --  Janet Ajzenstat --  F.L. Morton --  James Tully --  Peter Emberley -- 
<br/><br/> Annotation  <div>Canada's fifth effort at "mega-constitutional politics" was a period of popular discussion and leadership negotiation, that ran from the defeat in 1990 of the Meech Lake Accord through the Charlottetown Accord and the referendum of 26 October 1992. Constitutional Predicament explores the referendum in relation to the democratic process; nationalism (Canadian, Aboriginal, Québécois) and pluralism; principles of constitutionalism, constitution-making, and popular participation in constitution-making; the role of the Charter and Supreme Court; future constitutional efforts; and worldwide trends. The contributors agree that Canadian voters rejected the Charlottetown proposals because they disapproved of both their content and the procedure by which they were drawn up. They conclude that, while Quebec remains the chief problem for the Canadian constitution, Quebec was not the sole constitutional issue or the sole issue which determined how Canadians voted. The constitutional process did help make it apparent that Canada is multinational and that each of the three major nations has valid claims on the political system. The contributors offer contrasting views on how the Charlottetown Accord came to read as it does, why negotiators at Charlottetown so misjudged public opinion, and the prognosis for further constitution-making. Readers may also see the referendum vote as a preview of the vote in the general election of October 1993, which unseated the Tories one year later, almost to the day. Taken together with the accompanying provocative commentaries, the essays will be of specific interest to students of Canadian politics and constitutional affairs. The complete text of the Charlottetown Accord is included in an appendix. The contributors and commentators are Janet Ajzenstat, Alan C. Cairns, Curtis Cook, Barry Cooper, Peter Emberley, David Hendrickson, Robert J. Jackson, Juan Lindau, F.L. Morton, Alain Noël, and James Tully.</div> 
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/><label>ISBN: </label>9780773564756 9780773511927 
<br/><br/><label>Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: </label>
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Uniform Titles: </label><br/>Consensus Report on the Constitution (1992)
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Federal government--Canada--Congresses.<br/>Constitutional history--Canada--Congresses.
<br/><br/><label>Index Terms--Genre/Form: </label><br/>Electronic Books.
<br/><br/><label>LC Class. No.: </label>JL65  / .C667 1994